|
THE
National Association of Electricity Consumers for
Reforms Inc. (Nasecore) has urged the Office of the
Solicitor General (OSG) to oppose the settlement
agreement entered into between the National Power Corp.
(Napocor) and the Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) on the
dispute over their 10-year Contract for the Sale of
Electricity (CSE) that expired on December 31, 2004.
In a
letter addressed to Solicitor General Agnes Devanadera,
Nasecore president Pete Ilagan insisted that the Napocor
should withdraw from the joint application filed with
the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) on April 15,
2004, seeking the approval of the settlement agreement.
Nasecore
is an intervenor in the case and has been leading the
strong opposition to the approval of the settlement
agreement, which was signed in 2003.
The
consumers’ group has been prodding Napocor to abandon
the petition and instead vigorously pursue the
collection of its P52-billion receivables from Meralco,
representing principal, interest and surcharges on
Meralco’s failure to purchase contracted power with
Napocor based on their 10-year CSE.
Nasecore
has filed several motions with the ERC seeking the
dismissal of the application to approve the settlement
agreement, but the commission has yet to act on its
motion.
In
seeking OSG intervention, Nasecore said the government’s
chief counsel should review the settlement agreement and
intervene in the case pending with the ERC, as the
agreement is prejudicial to the interest of the
government and electricity consumers.
“We
trust that your office will share Nasecore’s position
and remain steadfast to its mandate of public service
and, thus, grant our request,” Nasecore said in letter
received by the OSG on April 21.
Nasecore
and the Freedom from Debt Coalition (FDC) are strongly
objecting to the settlement agreement, which will allow
Meralco to pass on to its over 4 million customers the
P20.05-billion agreed settlement amount that Meralco
will pay Napocor for its failure to purchase the
electricity it contracted.
Nasecore
claimed this will result in an additional rate increase
in the monthly bills of consumers in the amount of 12-
centavos per kilowatt-hour for a period of five to six
years.
The
agreement, according to Nasecore and the FDC, will give
Meralco the right to impose penalties on Napocor for its
alleged failure to construct transmission facilities for
Meralco’s independent power producers (IPPs), although
Napocor is not obligated to build such facilities under
the CSE.
The
groups also claimed that the settlement agreement will
permit Meralco to buy more expensive power from its IPPs—the
Lopez-owned First Gas San Lorenzo and First Gas Santa
Rita and Quezon Power Philippines Ltd.—and less power
from Napocor, a much cheaper source.
“This is
a gross violation of Meralco’s obligation to provide the
least-cost supply of electricity to its captive
customers as expressly provided for in the Electric
Power Industry Reform Act [Epira] and in its
megafranchise granted by Congress,” the groups said.
Furthermore, the groups insisted the settlement
agreement will result in multibillion-peso losses to the
government, as Napocor will only charge Meralco
P1.51/kWh for every kilowatt-hour that the latter
contracted to buy but failed to purchase from the
former.
Such
price, they noted, is very much lower than the
regulator-approved selling price of Napocor.
“The
only parties who will benefit from the settlement
agreement are Meralco and its stockholders, and
Meralco’s IPPs. This one-sided arrangement should be
opposed by all consumers and must be rejected by the
Energy Regulatory Commission,” they added. |