|
INDEPENDENT think tank IBON Foundation Inc. has remained
firm in its resolve to lobby against the ratification of
the Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (Jpepa),
saying the trade pact merely highlights the Arroyo
government’s insensitivity to Filipino nurses and
caregivers.
“Using
the so-called gains for nurses and caregivers to make
acceptable a patently unequal deal like the Jpepa only
shows an uncaring government that treats its labor force
as mere commodities for export,” IBON research head Jose
Enriquez Africa said in a statement.
While
the Arroyo regime is trying to portray that the treaty
is clearly advantageous for some few hundred health
workers, “in reality government is using them as fodder
to cover up for its severe failure in generating jobs
for Filipinos,” he added.
IBON
said the Japanese government has a state policy that
seeks to reduce the costs of nursing and caregiving
while facing the challenge of dealing with its aging
population.
This
situation, Africa said, has resulted in low wages and
poor working conditions that even Japanese health
professionals find intolerable.
IBON
said that in 2004, the average annual income of nurses
in Japan reached $40,000, which is much lower compared
with those working in the US who received $54,000 during
the same period.
Meanwhile, the development institution said female
caregivers in Japan receive $25,200 annually, while
males are paid as much as $40,000.
IBON
also cited a survey conducted by Japan’s Health, Labor
and Welfare Ministry in May 2007 which found that less
than half of Japanese nursing-care license holders have
turned down work in the industry because of low wages
and poor working conditions.
Further,
an earlier survey showed that seven in every 10 Japanese
nurses feel they could quit their jobs any time due to
chronic fatigue and professional disappointment.
Africa
said Jpepa and other similar deals let
Japan
hire nurses and caregivers even more cheaply.
For
instance, IBON explained, applicants who are already
working will be receiving pay only as nonlicensed
workers or trainees or candidates—or as nurse’s aides
and caregiver’s assistants—while trying to pass the
national exams after six months of language training, as
provided for in the provisions of Jpepa.
IBON
said that while this significantly lowers the cost of
health care for the Japanese, it is done at the expense
of Filipinos and other trained health professionals.
A study
made by the government research arm Philippine Institute
for Development Studies, whose primary client is the
National Economic and Development Authority, said the
benefits from the bilateral trade and investment
agreement will “greatly outweigh the costs of its
implementation” and “would be good for the economy.”
According to the report penned by PIDS president Josef
Yap and researchers Erlinda Medalla and Rafaelita Aldaba,
more than 200,000 Filipinos will move up the poverty
threshold. (By Antonio Tiemsin Jr.) |