|
FOREIGN
investors are demanding that they be given a say in the
crafting of the country’s Investment Priorities Plan (IPP).
Henry
Schumacher, executive vice president of the European
Chamber of Commerce of the
Philippines,
said the Joint Foreign Chambers (JFC) is now drafting a
letter asking Trade Secretary Peter Favila to include
them in the process of identifying which sectors would
qualify for government fiscal incentives under the IPP.
Currently, the Board of Investments, chaired by Favila,
is solely drafting the yearly IPPs and then presents
them to the various stakeholders during public hearings.
Schumacher said, currently, the JFC is not being invited
even in these public hearings.
“That
would be fine if we were invited in the pubic hearing.
But it should be while they are still crafting it, while
in the process and not after it has been finished,”
Schumacher said. He said a big portion of the yearly
investments that are being registered in the country are
coming from foreign investors so it is but right that
the government hears their side also in the preparation
of the IPP.
Foreign
businessmen account for about 40 percent of the yearly
fresh investments in the country.
“We
would like to be involved in the debate on what
industries would be included in the IPP and,
successfully, we were ignored. Come 2009, don’t forget
us,” Schumacher said.
For the
newly approved 2008 IPP, Schumacher said the JFC is not
frustrated because they feel that it is still too broad
to be clear to investors what kind of projects can
really avail of government incentives like income-tax
holidays and duty-free importation of capital equipment
and raw materials.
“We
really can’t understand what the government wants. It’s
very broad,” he said.
Rob
Sears of the American Chamber of Commerce said a clear
incentives regime is important in making the
Philippines
a competitive investment destination.
Also,
Sears said the government should not worry too much
about losses in revenues due to the grant of incentives,
to the point that perks given to strategic industries
will be removed just to save on perceived revenue
leakage.
In the
first place, he said the government will not have any
revenue to talk about if investors will not come in. |