|
THE New
York-based Citi Group, one of the world’s largest
financial-services firms, said the
Philippines
deserves more credit than Moody’s Investor Services has
given it.
In a
recent market commentary sparked by a news report that
said Manila was more vulnerable than Jakarta over rising
food and energy prices, Citi Group analyst Johanna Chua
said Moody’s has it in reverse.
Moody’s
previously said soaring food and energy prices in the
Philippines posed serious threats to Manila’s forecast
budget and exchange-rate objectives.
Chua
argued the impact of rising fuel and food prices on the
country’s fiscal and financing programs this year should
be less than Indonesia’s.
She
cited three reasons, the first centering on the argument
that Manila, unlike Indonesia, only moderately
subsidizes food.
Chua
noted the cost of food subsidies in
Manila account for only up to 0.8 percent of local output or the
gross domestic product (GDP) every year and carried
off-budget via the National Food Authority (NFA) and
funded through the NFA’s credit lines from local
commercial banks.
“The
obligations of the NFA are only gradually borne by the
national government, and the impact on the budget
deficit and financing program is limited up-front.
“While
this impacts on the consolidated public sector balance,
the burden and financing look manageable.
“Moreover, the government is already considering
increasing the subsidized NFA rice price from the
current P18.25 per kilo, which would help reduce the
subsidy bill,” the Citi Group analyst said. She also
said Jakarta’s fuel and electricity subsidies equal 5
percent of GDP or 19 percent of forecast spending this
year and directly carried in its budget.
Already,
the continued rise in fuel prices has forced Jakarta to
readjust its forecast budget balance on two occasions to
accommodate a 28-percent increase in its budget deficit
from original forecast level.
Chua
also said Manila’s financing flexibility this year looks
better than
Jakarta’s.
“Rice
subsidies in the
Philippines
are small enough to avail of existing local bank-credit
lines.
“Even if
the government incurs fiscal slippages, it also has
surplus cash position from 2007 [arising from asset sale
proceeds of P90.6 billion],” Chua said.
More
asset sale proceeds are expected this year, albeit under
more challenging circumstances than last year.
She
noted Manila has prepared a budget in which it is a net
borrower rather than net debt payor this time around.
“With
forecast net domestic bonds set to be negative (P19.9
billion of net domestic repayments) in 2008, we think
the Philippines has more room to expand local borrowing
to meet unforeseen financing shortfall,” Chua said.
According to Chua, Indonesia anticipates paying official
loans totaling $1.4 billion this year and that while
this could be financed by new program loans, the bulk of
its financing program is borne via net bond issuance
that was also seen to double the original forecast level
this year.
“With
local bond yields sensitive to supply, inflation and
monetary-policy expectations and global risk appetite
given heavy positioning, Indonesia will be more likely
to rely on foreign commercial borrowings,” Chua said. |