HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • Tax exemption endorsed;
    nonwage relief pushed
     
    By Fernan Marasigan and Max V. de Leon
    Reporters

    A TAX measure that virtually frees from any tax obligation all wage earners annually grossing P150,000 and below was approved Tuesday by the House committee on ways and means.

    During a committee hearing on Tuesday, legislators agreed to raise personal-tax exemptions from P96,000 to P150,000; and those earning within the new tax exemptions would be exempted from the 10-percent withholding tax-deductions from their monthly paychecks.

    This good news was complemented by the support of foreign businessmen in the country for President Arroyo’s call for the grant of nonwage benefits to employees, saying it is better than a wage hike that only further erodes the competitiveness of the Philippines as an investment destination.

    Henry Schumacher, executive vice president of the European Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines (ECCP), said they will gladly heed the call of the President provided that the nonwage relief is just a temporary measure.

    Prior to the approval of the tax exemption by the committee, PDP-Laban Rep. Teodoro Locsin Jr. of Makati City said the P150,000 personal income-tax exemption will be fair to both taxpayers and the government, but asked the finance department during the hearing, what will be its effect if it is raised to P200,000.

    Director Lourdes Recente, finance director, replied that raising the tax exemptions to P200,000 would mean a P15.17-billion revenue loss for the government.

    She said the DOF would agree to a P150,000-tax exemption, which would mean a P7.95-billion revenue loss for the government, provided it is implemented in two phases under their proposed Simplified Net Income Taxation (SNIT).

    Under the SNIT, minimum-wage earners will be exempted from paying taxes in Phase I, while Phase II will involve the granting of higher personal exemptions to low- and middle-income earners.

    Recente said that with SNIT, the government will only stand to lose P2.3 billion in revenues.

    Lakas Rep. Exequiel Javier of Antique, committee chairman, allayed DOF’s apprehension on the revenue loss for the government. With the higher tax exemptions, he said wage earners would have more money to spend, the more indirect taxes for the government in the forms of expanded value-added taxes imposed on all commodities purchased, offsetting the revenue losses derived from the tax exemptions in the process.

    Recente said that without the SNIT the DOF will oppose a higher tax exemption for minimum-wage earners and would even lobby for a presidential veto of the measure should it reach Malacañang.

    Committee members approved a motion for the drafting of a consolidated measure containing the proposed SNIT and higher tax exemptions after they agreed to the proposal of the DOF.

    Militant group Bayan expressed support for the higher personal exemption bills, but has some reservations on including SNIT because it will limit the list of deductions that professionals and self-employed tax payers can claim in computing their income taxes.

    The Financial Institutes Executives of the Philippines (Finex) also welcomed the proposed increase in personal exemptions to P150,000, but if this is passed with SNIT, it would like to know its features.

    The group feels that SNIT is anti-small business, as this would limit the itemized deductions for some income taxpayers. Some relevant expenses of professionals like expenses for training, professional development, and information technology will not be allowed as deductions if SNIT is implemented, Finex said.

    The other members of the foreign trade group, meanwhile, also spoke out in support of the President’s suggestion. Chris Ward of the Australian-New Zealand Chamber of Commerce said they are conscious of what their employees are going through right now but if they give a wage hike, they will also have to find out where they could recoup it. One sure way, he said, is for them to increase their prices, which would only diminish their competitiveness.

    “We will help where we can, but we cannot just give an increase if we can’t find something to cover that,” Ward said.

    Rob Sears of the American Chamber of Commerce said when it comes to wage rates in the region, the Philippines is the least competitiveness right now, and giving further hikes will make it worse.

    Schumacher said “My concern is with the rice crisis, it is a dangerous time to negotiate wages. We should wait for it to go to the normal level, not when hoarding is still taking place.”

    He said the call of President Arroyo for the grant of nonwage benefits makes sense “to circumnavigate this perceived or real rice crisis.”

    OTHER STORIES

    DBCC outlook seen dimmer


    From just fretting over peso, BPOs rising to challenge


    Sleight of hand or miracle? RP imports ‘Milagrosa’ rice


    RP may not be able to secure more rice from East Asia


    ‘Use Acef, Afma residual funds for rice drive’


    Business told: Heed signs, look to ‘green’ paths


    The ‘real’ Hooters opens at Mall of Asia


    Tax exemption endorsed; nonwage relief pushed


    Brace for new increase in electric bills


    Congress eyes May 1 passage of cheap medicine, tax bills


    Earth Day focus: revival of waterways