|
WITH
barely two months left to decide on the fate of the
Comprehensive Agrarian-Reform Program (CARP),
agrarian-reform advocates warned that hunger and poverty
may worsen should Congress fail to pass a bill funding
the program’s extension for another 5 to 10 years.
Nueva
Ecija 1st District Rep. Edgard Joson said the fate of
CARP depends on the approval of the proposed
P327-billion budget for CARP’s extension, taking into
consideration the remaining 1.3 million hectares of
“CARP-able” land which the government still has to
distribute and the need to continue the support services
to sustain the gains of the program in the rural areas.
He told
reporters during a press conference in Quezon City
Monday that extending CARP is now up to the leadership
of the House of Representatives and the members of
Lakas-Kampi, the dominant party in the House of
Representatives.
At the
same press conference, agrarian-reform advocates
reiterated their call for the government to extend the
program in the wake of the looming food crisis.
The
Philippine Legislators’ Committee on Population and
Development (PLCPD) also said imposing a ban on land
conversion is not enough to solve the current rice
crisis, saying extending CARP to boost food production
will.
Jimmy
Tadeo, chairman of Paragos-Pilipinas, said with 1.3
million hectares of land remaining undistributed, the
fate of more than 635,000 landless farmers and farm
workers are in peril once Congress fails to extend CARP.
He added
that the nondistribution of the lands would only
exacerbate the worsening poverty and hunger in the
countryside.
Akbayan
Party-list Rep. Risa Hontiveros-Baraquel, a board member
of PLCPD, agreed with the farmers, saying hunger and
poverty being experienced in the countryside is directly
linked to the problem of landlessness. Hontiveros-Baraquel
authored House Bill 1257, which seeks to accelerate and
strengthen the implementation of CARP, which she said
will help prevent the food crisis.
Joson
said the members of Lakas-Kampi, which now has the power
to extend or reject the proposal to extend CARP, will be
a factor in deciding the fate of CARP. “I don’t know
what Speaker [Prospero] Nograles is up to, but it is up
to the dominant party, Lakas-Kampi, now whether to pass
the bill. If they are not going to pass it within the
next two months, then it will be very difficult to pass
it in the next three years,” he said.
Joson
said the consolidated bill the Committee on Agrarian
Reform will likely come up with will have certain
amendments.
Different versions of a bill that seeks to extend CARP
have been filed by lawmakers, including party-list
lawmakers led by Rep. Hontiveros-Baraquel, which seeks
certain amendment to the program. Five more bills in
support of CARP extension have been filed before the
House of Representatives as of April 11, 2008.
The
legislators who authored the bills extending CARP were
Rep. Wilfredo Mark Enverga (HB 2948), Rep. Edgar M.
Chatto (HB 3369), Rep. Liwayway Vinzons-Chato (HB 3559),
Rep. Eduardo Nonato N. Joson (HB 3613) and Rep. Leonila
V. Chavez (HB 3702).
Each
bill seeks to strengthen CARP implementation by amending
for the purpose pertinent provisions of RA 6657, but the
bills in the period of extension and the amount of
additional funding support to accelerate CARP.
Joson
proposed to fund CARP by amending the expanded
value-added tax (E-VAT) law. He said there’s a need to
amend the law so as to channel a portion of the revenue
generated by the government through E-VAT to fund CARP.
He said
the government can also source some funds from the sale
of government assets, which he said is obviously being
resorted to by the administration to raise funds,
anyway.
The
lawmaker from Nueva Ecija, however, said there’s now a
need to shift focus from land acquisition to the more
bigger task of providing support services to boost food
production.
“The
problem is, there was no sufficient funding allocated
for support services. Allocation for support services
accounted for only 25-percent out of the total budget
appropriations for CARP.
There
would have been no problem with a 25 percent allocation
if the total amount appropriated for CARP is sufficient
to accommodate the budgetary needs of the three program
components,” he said.
He is
confident the P327-billion fund for CARP’s extension by
another seven years should be enough to compensate for
lands which should now be subjected to compulsory land
acquisition and distribution. Under the consolidated
bill, he said voluntary land transfer and voluntary
offer to sell should be repealed.
This
will help ensure there would be no excess or wastages of
government resources vis-à-vis the shortening of the
extension period by three years because the amount of
the program components are already pegged under Section
10 of the proposed measure.
The
portion allocated for the program from the General
Appropriations Act has been increased to P15 billion
from P3 billion in order to address the issues of
inflation and obtain a reliable funding source, Joson
said. |