|
CEBU Air
Inc., also known as Cebu Pacific, says it is unfazed by
the entry of PAL Express—the newly established low-fare
unit of Philippine Airlines (PAL)—and remains confident
it would emerge as the country’s top domestic airline.
It said
revenues and domestic passengers would rise to least 30
percent and 20 percent, respectively, this year.
In a
press briefing yesterday on Cebu Pacific’s tie-up with
Navitaire, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Accenture, the
airline’s president lauded the entry of PAL Express in
the budget-airline market.
“The set
up of PAL Express is going to be good for the travel
market. It will be the consumers who will benefit from
this. It will further enhance the low-cost airline
industry,” said chief executive officer Lance Gokongwei.
Cebu
Pacific expects passenger load to increase 40 percent to
45 percent from 5.5 million last year. “This year, we
will exceed our seven million target passengers,”
Gokongwei said.
For the
first three months of the year, Cebu Pacific registered
more than 20-percent increase in passenger load from a
year earlier.
The
budget carrier of JG Summit Holdings Inc. is also
projecting full-year revenues to go over P20 billion
from about P15 billion in 2007.
“This
year we are looking at a 30 percent growth in revenues,”
Gokongwei said.
Cebu
Pacific’s net profit in 2007 jumped to P3.61 billion
from its 2006 profit of P197 million. Of the amount,
foreign exchange gains were recorded at P1.9 billion,
leaving the airline with a recurring net income of P1.7
billion.
“The
objective this year is to exceed the recurring income
last year. Definitely, our first three months are ahead
of last year’s revenue and net income,” said Gokongwei.
From January to March last year, Cebu Pacific’s bottom
line stood at about P350 million.
The
low-fare carrier implemented last week a P100-increase
in fuel surcharge for one-way domestic travel. It is
also contemplating on adjusting the same for its
international routes.
“We are
seeing dark clouds ahead. We expect a rapid increase in
fuel price which is creeping up so much that it’s
already 45 percent to 50 percent of our operating cost.
In 2007, fuel cost was just below 40 percent.
Definitely, we need a fuel surcharge,” Gokongwei added. |