|
The
report about the government’s predisposition to unload
its strategic 40-percent share in Petron Corp. is giving
credence to the renewed buzz that the Alcantara family
is out to seek control of the oil firm. For the
Alcantaras, the prospect of adding Petron to their
growing conglomerate is a strategic fit in this
challenging regime of business environment made
difficult by the subprime mess that has engulfed notable
names in the world of finance, such as Bear Stearns.
This
foray into the energy industry by the Alcantara group
makes sense since most conglomerates are now making a
beeline for this business field due to the prevailing
view that the Petron stock is a defensive stock because
it is considered a utility stock. The name of the game
now is diversification, and the Alcantara family’s plan
to buy into Petron affords it a window of opportunity
and a toehold in the oil industry.
It must
be noted that Saudi Aramco and the Alcantaras were
earlier in talks regarding the desire of the foreign
firm to let go of its 40-percent share in Petron.
Unfortunately the talks fizzled out, although the
emergence later on of a fund manager, Ashmore Holdings,
as a prospective buyer of Saudi Aramco’s equity position
gave rise to renewed speculation that the entry of
Ashmore into the Petron equation, thanks to the supposed
rmediation efforts of former trade chief Roberto Ongpin,
may just be a “holding strategy” for the moment.
Thus,
the pronouncement early this week that the government is
also set to sell its own 40-percent holdings allows the
Alcantaras a chance of getting a controlling stake in
the company, which is a strategic move aimed not just at
diversifying its interests but at riding a new business
wave that is energy. The race to gain a toehold in the
energy industry has become an intense battleground in
business. In fact, even beer-and-food giant San Miguel
Corp. is willing to forgo its supposed core business to
be in the so-called sunshine industries like energy.
Why,
even the oil-exploration industry is suddenly buzzing
with considerable interest from notable names in the
Philippine business scene. The surge in the price of oil
to above $100 per barrel has given rise to intense
lobbying for prized oil-and-gas acreage in offshore
Palawan and other prospects. Even Energy Secretary Angelo Reyes is
said to have noticed an avalanche of interest from
business groups wanting to prospect for oil in the
country. And all because the surge in the price of oil
has made the risk in oil prospecting a worthy gamble.
An
oil-well drilling means investing $8 million, not to
mention the seismic survey and the 3D sounding of the
humps that may contain oil or gas. A discovery of
trapped oil that could contain, say, 30 million barrels,
would fetch $3 billion, as against the projected
expenditures of $750 million, tops, for the
establishment of an oil platform and the oil-flowing
exercise, as well as getting an oil tanker to store the
find until it is sold in the market.
Rice
coupons
The
government’s plan to issue rice coupons for the poor as
a temporary relief from the rice crisis has gotten the
nod of Sen. Loren Legarda, who supported the proposal to
“cushion the impact of the high prices of rice on the
poor as a humanitarian act.” The senator pointed out,
though, that the rice crisis resulted from wrong
government economic policies and neglect of the farm
sector. “ The poor should not be punished for the
mistakes of their government. We should not let them
starve,” she said.
Under
the proposal, the Department of Social Welfare and
Development would distribute rice coupons to those
categorized as “poor.” This would entitle them to buy
rice from the National Food Authority (NFA) at
subsidized prices. The measure would do away with the
possible black marketing of the staple as there is a
wide disparity between NFA rice and commercial rice. But
what is needed, as correctly pointed out by the senator,
is that the government should give more support to the
farmers through irrigation services, fertilizer and
hybrid-seed subsidies, farm-to-market roads and
technical assistance.
According to Legarda, the current crisis is not only
rice shortage, but more the steep increase in the price
of the commodity that the poor can no longer afford.
“This is why the poor are queuing up for hours just to
be able to buy NFA rice at subsidized prices, even
though non-NFA or commercial rice is available
elsewhere. The issue is the price of rice which the poor
cannot afford.”
She said
imported rice is available from foreign sources provided
the “right price” is paid. But because of the 50-percent
tariff on imported rice, it is “utterly out of the reach
of the poor, or even of the middle-income groups.” Loren
said that since the rice crisis consists mainly of an
acute shortage of locally produced rice and a steep
increase in the prices of the rice bought from abroad,
the government should consider suspending the 50-percent
tax on imported rice to “provide the Filipino consumers
with economic relief, even if only temporarily.”
Legarda
said that even the middle class may no longer be able to
afford imported rice because its price has been bloated
by another 50 percent. “We must remember that the
50-percent tariff on rice imports is based on normal
local rice production. But when our people are faced
with a general rice crisis of unprecedented high rice
prices, then it’s a new situation altogether. We must
give a relief to the consumer by temporarily lifting the
tariffs until the situation has normalized,” Legarda
declared that government policymakers should take a
lesson from the current rice crisis by reviewing the
current agricultural policies which encourage export
orientation and import dependence on staples while
promoting production of cash crops.
“I think
we should give priority to food security for all our
people,” said Legarda, who is chair of the Senate
Committee on Economic Affairs. “Once our food security
is established, we can produce other crops for export.
But you cannot do anything without a full stomach.
Besides, food security would save us expenses in foreign
exchange which we can use for developmental purposes.”
E-mail: hugagni@yahoo.com |