|
AMID
rising criticisms of the country’s statistical agencies,
the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) has
urged the government and the private sector to increase
their investments in statistics.
NSCB
executive director Romulo Virola said there is a need to
increase the advocacy for good statistics to effectively
contribute to sound decision-making and that both the
government and the private sector play important roles
in highlighting the importance of statisticians and
statistics in society.
Virola
also called on the National Statistics Office (NSO) to
strive to produce critical statistics that reach even
the “provincial level of disaggregation” that would
contribute significantly to good statistics. The NSO, he
said, should also disseminate data on a timely manner.
“The
government and the private sector must invest in
statistics and appreciate the important role of
statisticians and statistics in society,” Virola
recently said in his regular online column
“Statistically Speaking.”
“The
local government units [LGUs] must also develop
the capacity and the political will to generate
statistics themselves,” he added.
Virola
also answered questions raised by former National
Economic and Development Authority (Neda) director
generals, such as Dr. Felipe Medalla and Dr. Cielito
Habito, regarding the accuracy of the Philippine System
of National Accounts (PSNA).
The NSCB
chief explained that the PSNA statistics are not the
same as the Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES)
statistics. Virola said the Personal Consumption
Expenditure (PCE) from the PSNA is not the same as the
Family/Household Expenditures from the FIES in the same
way that the Disposable Income of the Household Sector
from the PSNA is not the same as the Family Income from
the FIES.
“If
these terms are conceptually different, why should their
growth rates be the same? Simple arithmetic should be
able to explain why not. However, since these sets of
terms are conceptually close to each other, one can
expect the trends to be the same. Indeed they are, and
not only before 2001, as our official statistics show,”
Virola said.
“If we
look at the PSNA PCE and the FIES Total Family
Expenditures at Current Prices, their trends are
definitely not divergent. In fact, even the PSNA
compensation inflow and the total factor income inflow
[compensation plus property income] and the total family
expenditures [FIES] show similar trends. Note also that
between 1985 and 1988, the growth rate of PCE was
higher than that of Total Family Expenditures, just like
it was after 1997,” Virola added.
With
these reasons, Virola said he firmly believes that the
two former Neda chiefs are not insinuating that the NSCB
tried to mar the credibility of the agency in coming up
with reliable economic data.
“I am
convinced that no way are they accusing us in the NSCB
of deliberately manipulating the figures. But also, I
do not understand the ‘inconsistencies’ they are talking
about,” Virola said.
The NSCB
chief also defended the 2007 gross domestic product
(GDP) of 7.3 percent and said that the only reason why
this does not reflect the results of the latest poverty
statistics is the fact that the poverty incidence that
were recently released accounted the poverty incidence
between 2003 and 2006.
Virola
also said that in the past, the NSCB has said that
economic growth does not always have to translate to
actual reduction in poverty.
“If
there is economic growth but the rich gets richer or the
income distribution becomes even more unequal, or prices
of commodities purchased by the poor rise too fast,
poverty can indeed worsen. That is why it is very
important for the rich and the famous among our civil
society to nurture that virtue of social responsibility
that we all love to talk about,” Virola said.
In an
earlier forum, Medalla said the government’s ability to
come up with credible statistics remains unreliable due
to the lack of funding and autonomy of its statistical
agencies.
Medalla
said while the government has announced that its GDP in
2007 was a 31-year high at 7.3 percent, this is not
exactly accurate, since it does not corroborate the
results of the FIES and the latest poverty statistics.
He noted
the average growth rate of the PCE from 2004 to 2006 was
the highest in the last 20 years, but the growth rate of
GNI net of taxes or GNP adjusted for changes in the
international terms of trade and taxes, was the lowest
during the last 10 years.
“The
national income accounts show the highest growth rates
of GDP and personal consumption after 2000. The FIES
show the opposite trends. The FIES shows that these are
the worst periods for consumer consumption but the PCE
and GDP show that it’s the best periods for
consumption,” Medalla said.
“The
growth rate of real BIR collections is more correlated
with the growth rate of FIES Income than the growth rate
of GDP,” he added. |