|
While
the global debate rages on whether the biofuel
revolution is causing imbalances in food security
systems and increasing the emissions of greenhouse
gases, the “smart”’ biofuel crops developed, utilized
and promoted by the International Crops Research
Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (Icrisat) ensure
energy and environmental security.
Dr.
William Dar, director general of Icrisat, said the time
has come to ensure that only smart biofuel crops are
developed and utilized so that they can link the poor
farmers of the dry lands to the biofuel market, without
compromising on their food security or causing
environmental damage.
“Smart
biofuel crops are those that ensure food security,
contribute to energy security, provide environmental
sustainability, tolerate the impacts of climate change
on shortage of water and high temperatures and increase
livelihood options,” Dr. Dar said.
Through
its BioPower Strategy, Icrisat is developing and
promoting sweet sorghum as a major feedstock for
bioethanol.
Sweet
sorghum is a carbon-dioxide neutral crop, which is a big
contributory factor of its being called a smart crop.
Icrisat-bred
sweet sorghum varieties and hybrids have increased sugar
content in the juice in their stalks. Its rainy-season
varieties give 42-percent higher sugar yield, and
rainy-season hybrids give a 20-percent increased sugar
yield.
Sweet
sorghum has a strong pro-poor advantage since it has a
triple-product potential—grain, juice for ethanol and
bagasse (crushed stalk waste) for livestock feed and
power generation.
Its
highlight is that there is no compromise on farmers’
food security since the grain is available for farmers
along with the sugar-rich juice from the stalk that can
be distilled to ethanol.
It
offers more benefits, such as:
• It is
a cost-effective and competitive feedstock.
• It has
a shorter crop cycle of four months compared with the 12
months of sugar cane.
• It has
a water requirement of 4,000 cubic meters (cu m) to
produce a kiloliter of bioethanol, compared with 36,000
cu m required for sugar cane.
Putting
all the factors together, the feedstock cost to produce
1 kiloliter of ethanol from sweet sorghum is $81.6,
whereas it is $111.5 for sugar cane and $89.2 for maize.
Sweet
sorghum is tolerant to water scarcity and high
temperatures—two qualities which will keep the crop in
good stead when the climate changes with global warming.
It also
has high water-use efficiency. While sorghum requires
310 kg of water per kg of dry matter, maize requires 370
kg of water per kg of dry matter.
Sweet
sorghum is a carbon-dioxide neutral crop that makes it
environment-friendly, and does not add to greenhouse-gas
emissions. During its growth cycle, a hectare of sweet
sorghum cultivation absorbs and emits 45 tons of carbon.
The crop
also has a good energy balance, that is, unit of energy
generated per unit of fossil-fuel energy invested in its
cultivation. It generates 8 units of energy for every
unit of fossil-fuel energy invested, which compares
favorably with sugar cane’s 8.3 units and corn’s only
1.8 units.
It has
been studied that gasoline blended with ethanol has
lower emissions when run through an automobile engine
than pure gasoline. E85, the fuel with 85-percent
ethanol, has only 1 part per million (ppm) concentration
of nitrogen oxide, whereas gasoline has 9 ppm.
Icrisat’s initiative to produce biofuels is not limited
to bioethanol from sweet sorghum alone. Through its
watershed-development project, it is promoting the
cultivation of pongamia and jatropha, from which
biodiesel can be extracted.
Icrisat
is promoting the cultivation of these biodiesel crops by
marginalized communities, such as tribal groups and
women’s self-help groups, and ensuring that they are
planted on wastelands. The groups get additional income
after harvesting and crushing the seeds, selling the oil
and selling the seedcake (the residue after crushing) to
farmers as an organic fertilizer. Some of the oil is
used to power village diesel engines such as generators
and irrigation pumps.
“Likewise, our biodiesel initiatives produce green fuel
and rehabilitate degraded lands, enhance greenery,
conserve rainwater and provide a sustainable income
source for the landless and marginal farmers,” said Dr
Dar.
The
issues of food versus fuel, climate change and
environment, land use and impact on poverty alleviation
vis-à-vis biofuels call for stimulating and informed
science-based policy-making, Dr. Dar said.
That
means a framework to promote biofuels should be linked
to national and regional poverty reduction, food
security and climate-proofing strategies, Dr. Dar
stressed. |