|
THE
Armed Forces chief of staff, Gen. Hermogenes Esperon
Jr., is trying to strike a bargain with some of the 28
military officers accused of mutiny over still unknown
reasons, a defense lawyer said on Thursday.
Trixie
Angeles, lawyer of Maj. Gen. Renato Miranda and Army
Capt. Ruben Guinolbay, said the bargain was relayed by
Esperon through one of his staff members, Maj. CJ Perez.
Miranda
was the Marines commandant during the 2006 foiled coup
attempt.
Angeles
said Perez, on alleged order of Esperon, visited twice
the officers, who are the targets of the offer, at their
detention cells at the Intelligence Service, Armed
Forces headquarters in Camp Aguinaldo, Quezon City.
While
the overtures have been made, Angeles said they (the
detained officers) do not know why Esperon was making
the effort, as Perez did not say what the chief of staff
or the military will get in return.
“There
is a suspicion that it was being made out of fear...that
he would soon be out of power,” the lawyer said of
Esperon, who is set to retire on May 9.
She said
Perez talked to all the junior officers (those having
the ranks of captain down to lieutenant), but skipped
the senior officers. Three of the senior officers, aside
from Miranda, are former Army Scout Ranger Regiment
commander Brig. Gen. Danilo Lim, and Marine Cols. Ariel
Querubin and Achilles Segumalian.
All of
the 28 officers are facing mutiny and other lesser
charges, including conduct unbecoming an officer and a
gentleman, as a result of their alleged involvement in
the February 2006 foiled coup attempt.
All of
the lesser charges have already prescribed, as the
two-year period for the officers to be arraigned has
already expired.
Angeles
said Esperon might be following his successful move in
having the nine members of the Magdalo Group plead
guilty to participating or launching the 2003 coup
attempt.
The nine
officers, including Capts. Gerardo Gambala and Milo
Maestrecampo, were sentenced early this week by the
Regional Trial Court in Makati.
Gambala
and Maestrecampo were sentenced to a maximum of 40
years, while the others received six years to 12 years’
imprisonment.
In his
talk with the junior officers, Angeles said that Perez
allegedly brought out the idea of “no prosecution”
against them, which will lead to the dismissal of the
charges owing to lack of evidence.
The
absence of prosecution was already orally filed by
defense lawyers last week before the court martial, a
move which was not opposed by military prosecutors.
Instead,
the trial judge advocate (prosecution) asked for a
period of more than two weeks from the court to study
the motion and go over the records of the case.
Angeles
said Perez also approached Maj. Gen. Jogy Leo Fojas,
president of the court martial, right after the hearing
last week and relayed the same message from Esperon.
She said
Esperon, through his staff, asked what Fojas can do for
the officers.
“His
[Perez’s] exact words were, he was sent by General
Esperon to speak to General Fojas and asked what General
Fojas can do for the junior officers,” Angeles said.
The
defense lawyer said Esperon’s move confirmed that he was
really behind the proceedings.
“He is
the convening authority. He is the reviewing authority
and along the way, he is directing the proceedings,” she
said.
Angeles
wondered whether Esperon’s offer could work out as she
noted that all of the 28 officers were charged together,
and with the same offenses, which means the court cannot
declare a “no prosecution” against the junior officers
and proceed with the charges against the senior
officers.
The
lawyer also suspects that the move was meant to divide
the officers. |