|
A SENIOR
House leader has joined the Philippine Association of
Independent Power Producers (Pippa) in its demand to
strip the National Power Corp. (Napocor) the right to
procure coal and oil under the proposed measure to amend
the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (Epira).
Nationalist People’s Coalition Rep. Arnulfo Fuentebella
of Camarines Sur, a member of the Joint Congressional
Power Committee (JCPC) and principal author of Epira,
said it would be more prudent to transfer the
procurement of the IPP’s fuel to IPP administrators
because of “fuel problems encountered in some power
plants when they are being operated by Napocor.”
Fuentebella said the transfer of fuel-procurement
function to the IPPAs would enable the IPPs to meet
their contractual obligations or supply agreements they
would enter into, a concern which has been raised by
industry players.
Stakeholders in the power sector want the
fuel-procurement function of Napocor over IPPs
transferred to Pippa.
They
said this would also eliminate persistent allegations of
graft and corruption in the procurement of coal.
Citing
Section 47 of Epira, Pippa, in a position paper
submitted to the House, said allowing Napocor to retail
fuel procurement while obligating IPPAs to market the
energy output under NPC-IPP contracts “will be
counterproductive and reduce privatization proceeds of
the government.”
It said
proposed House Bill 1889, which seeks to amend Epira,
must be revised so that privatization would become
“capacity-and-energy available under its [Napocor] IPP
contracts.”
The
proposed amendment also noted that the obligation that
will be assumed by the IPPA upon privatization is
limited to the obligation to sell the energy output
under the IPP contract concerned.
“By
implication, the procurement of fuel under the IPP
contract would remain with Napocor. This situation would
not be advisable,” the group said.
“Epira
intends to fully privatize Napocor and does not
contemplate Napocor having a residual function or
existence as a fuel-procurement company. The bidders to
the Ippa administration privatization would consider
carcing out the fuel-procurement function in favor of
Napocor as a diminution in the value of the IPP
contract. The winning bidder would assume a significant
higher risk in selling the energy output when it has no
control over the fuel used...higher risk translates to
lower privatization value,” it added.
Ernesto
Pantangco, Pippa president, said the Department of
Energy and the JCPC could decide in removing Napocor’s
fuel-procurement function.
Recalling the recent charges against Napocor officials,
Pantangco said allowing Napocor to still administer the
procurement of coal would still be a problem.
He said
that even “as you privatized it, this could be one
source of corruption.”
Early
this year Napocor was asked to explain its procurement
following the high price of electricity traded in the
spot market during the summer months and the power
outages that hit Metro Manila as a result of lack of
fuel supply.
The
Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corp.
(Psalm) is set to auction Napocor’s IPP contracts to the
IPPAs early next year.
Psalm
was authorized and mandated to take title to and
possession of the Napocor IPP contracts and to appoint,
after public bidding, qualified independent entities who
shall act as IPPAs. |