|
IN an
effort to resolve the impasse on the country’s baselines
issue, Speaker Prospero Nograles will meet with members
of the House foreign affairs committee and the heads of
the parties composing the majority coalition hoping to
come out with a formula on how to best resolve
conflicting positions among the three branches of
government.
At the
same time, Nograles proposed that the issue should be
discussed in the Legislative-Executive Development
Advisory Council (Ledac), which he hopes would be
convened the soonest possible time.
This
after Malacañang pushed for the review of House Bill
3216, or “An Act Defining the Archipelagic Baselines of
the Philippine Archipelago, Amending for the Purpose
Republic Act 3046, as Amended by Republic Act 5446,”
which members of the House planned to pass on third and
final reading when Congress resumes session on April 21.
Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita wrote Nograles a
letter on April 4 reaffirming the position of the
Executive branch relative to the Philippine archipelagic
baseline, which is “to enclose the main archipelago
within the baselines and treat the Kalayaan Group of
Islands as a regime of islands.”
“We will
meet the soonest possible time with members of the
foreign affairs committee and talk to the heads of the
parties composing the majority coalition regarding
baselines bill. Time is of the essence as we have
international deadlines to meet,” Nograles said.
Nograles
said the urgency of the baselines bill prompted him
to forgo his international obligation to attend the
118th Interparliamentary Union Assembly in Cape
Town, South Africa, from April 13 to 18, so that he can
have time to bring out the best formula to resolve
conflicting positions on the Baselines issue and, at the
same time, get himself an executive medical checkup.
Nograles
said the country cannot afford to commit a smallest
mistake on the issue “because the fate of our nation is
at stake.”
Nograles
said he is receptive to the position of Malacañang, but
he wants to make sure that the country’s legal position
to pursue its claim over the Spratlys is not compromised
and all questions regarding its effect on national
sovereignty have been adequately answered.
“As a
trained lawyer, I only want to deal with facts. We have
varying opinions on this issue and I want to listen to
all sides, for or against the position of the executive
department. In the end, we will have study the merits of
each position and hopefully we can find the best and
most acceptable formula to resolve conflicting school of
thoughts,” he said.
Nograles
said that it is also useless if Congress and the
executive branch cannot meet eye-to-eye on the baselines
bill because the President can veto it if she feels
strongly against its provisions.
He added
that it is also difficult to even come out with a
Baselines Law if the Senate’s version is in complete
contrast with the House version.
“We want
to avoid a irreconcilable deadlock because we have a
deadline to meet. We do not want to end up without
anything to bring to the UN on May 2009,” he said. |