HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • Alternative to PDEX mulled
     
    By Jun Vallecera
    Reporter

    BECAUSE the facilities of the Philippine Dealing and Exchange Corp. (PDEX) are so expensive, thrift banks have started talking with a mixed group of investors willing to set up an alternative trading platform by which securities trades may happen.

    And by the looks of it, the more affordable exchange may yet be built given that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has declared the plan free from possible legal complications in the future.

    “It is actually being considered and if there is a meeting of requirements, it can happen,” Philippine Savings Bank president Pascual M. Garcia III told reporters on Wednesday. Pascual is the Chamber of Thrift Banks vice president.

    According to him, a group of thrift banks is seriously looking at alternative platforms being offered by a mixed group of domestic, as well as foreign technology providers that would allow them to do securities trade and other services for clients without paying an arm and a leg for it.

    The CTB had earlier urged PDEX to rethink its trading fees and charges, as well as its other impositions that tend to push securities costs higher than warranted—only to be told no one was forcing anybody to be a PDEX member in order to execute trades.

    According to Garcia, the alternative platform may yet see the light of day provided it gets recognized as a self-regulatory organization as provided by law.

    And, they may not have to build a complex corporate animal to get the required cost considerations they have in mind: “We don’t have to build it ourselves. We only need to tie up with the technology providers.”

    He said the SEC told them they can be part of an SRO that was so recognized and accredited.

    “SEC chairman Fe Barin clarified to us no one was compelled to be a member of any particular SRO,” Garcia said.

    He also said the one possible factor that could throw a monkey wrench into the plan was the price of the technology that, according to him, was Internet- or web-based in this case.

    As to the question of volume or the economic scale of the initial trades making the proposition attactive: “It should not be very big but it’s a start.”

    The CTB’s core issues against PDEX center on its schedule of fees based on the volume of securities to be traded in its platform, plus all other fees and charges—these all add up to an unacceptable level.

    Garcia said the web-based technology under consideration was definitely cheaper than that provided at present by PDEX, and this has forced the small banks to seriously evaluate their merits.

    OTHER STORIES

    $1.3-B rice subsidy ‘bearable’


    P50/kilo rice sure formula for unrest


    NFA eyeing hike in its retail price


    Waiting game on tariff lifting


    Korean chamber scores ‘trial by publicity’


    Copper-concentrate output to rise 34%


    Shell wins case to nix surcharge


    4 firms submit bid price for Bonifacio City ‘Delta Lots’


    Alternative to PDEX mulled


    10 brokers vie for 6 seats in PSE board


    AMWSLAI dispute resolved