|
In the
15th and
16th centuries,
Spain ruled the world. It took the lead in global
exploration and colonial expansion as it opened trade
routes across the seas and established new territories
all over, including Asia and the Americas. But as with
all far-reaching empires, geopolitics made sure its
demise would be only a matter of time. Thus, over the
years new superpowers emerged and, nowadays, China and
India are giving the European and the
United States
economies stiff competition.
Today
Spain
is still among the largest economies in the world. Its
companies have also maintained their standing in global
business. One Spanish firm, for instance, is now
reportedly the world’s leading supplier of value-added
services for mobile phones and the Internet, given its
presence in over 50 countries, including the
Philippines, through agreements with over 100
mobile-phone networks. It reported revenues of over $500
million in 2007. And it even bested its closest
competitor, reportedly a Chinese company, not too long
ago in a bid to gain control over a financially troubled
UK firm listed in the London Stock Exchange.
While it seems to be doing very well worldwide, this
Spanish company appears to have found itself in a bit of
a legal mess on local shores, as the direct result of
its takeover of that UK company. This was because prior
to that takeover, the UK firm reportedly signed a
contract to purchase a Philippine firm in the same line
of business. The UK firm had reportedly offered to buy
the RP firm through a share-swap scheme involving the UK
firm’s listed shares in London—with 50 percent payment
already made to the RP firm upon signing, and the
remaining 50 percent payable two years after. In the
interim, local shareholders retained control.
But because of its financial troubles, the UK firm had
taken on a strategic investor, and it had chosen the
Spaniards over the Chinese. However, given the valid
sale contract, the RP firm’s consent to the strategic
investment was reportedly sought. And with the
Spaniard’s supposed verbal promise to honor the sale
terms after their takeover, the RP firm had agreed to
it. But after the takeover and shortly before it was to
pay the remaining 50-percent payment due the RP firm
under its sale contract, at the behest of its new
Spanish owners the UK firm instead delisted from London
and thus allegedly breached the terms of its original
sale contract with the RP firm. Since then, the
Spanish-controlled UK firm has been moving to assert its
ownership of the local company.
The RP firm’s troubles first came to light sometime last
year initially with rumors in business circles regarding
a husband and wife who reportedly fled the country and
temporarily sought refuge abroad because of alleged
death threats from the woman’s former employer,
apparently the RP firm. This was after the woman filed a
complaint against the RP firm for allegedly anomalous
business activities. The complaint was later dismissed.
While this seems to be unrelated to its troubles with
the UK firm’s new owners, at this time the RP firm was
already in a legal dispute with them. Further
investigation by the employer also revealed that the
dismissed employee and her husband allegedly used
company credit cards to purchase airline tickets to Hong
Kong, Shanghai, Beijing, Macau, Paris and even Madrid,
and to book hotel accommodations online for their
personal benefit. And this was shocking as it was
scandalous. After all, the man is the grandson of a
former president, and his wife the daughter of a former
senator. Credit-card fraud charges were later filed
against the couple.
And then, only recently, a corporate lawyer, and a
professor in
Ateneo
Law School at that, also ended up being charged before
prosecutors for allegedly falsifying documents
reportedly in favor of the Spanish-controlled UK firm.
The lawyer comes from one of the country’s top law
firms, and obviously just found himself in the midst of
an intracorporate dispute. Unfortunately, as he did the
bidding of his client, the Spanish-controlled UK firm,
he reaped a charge of falsification of documents.
Reportedly at the behest of his client, and in his
supposed capacity as corporate secretary of the RP firm,
he wrote the RP firm’s bank to request for a change in
designated authorized signatories in favor of his
Spanish clients. His actions, when uncovered by local
shareholders, were disputed by the RP firm, thus the
charge.
The latest word is that the Spanish-controlled UK firm
and the RP firm, perhaps to avoid lengthy court
proceedings on who should gain control of the local
business, have both agreed to resolve their dispute
through arbitration, and that the panel of arbiters is
expected to issue its decision in the coming weeks.
Arbitration is perhaps the better route to resolving
this mysterious web of business-circle rumors and
intrigues. For sure, both parties are looking forward to
seeing the end of lawsuits in this almost year-long
dispute.
Comments to matort@yahoo.com |