|
About a
week ago Manuel L. Quezon III sent me two documents
penned by Jun Lozada, “Telling the Truth” and “My
Reflections on my 2nd Month of Calvary.” (Those
documents can be accessed at
http://www.quezon.ph/1746/on-lozada-the-perils-of-being-a-snitch/.)
The first, Quezon points out, is “primarily addressed to
members of the clergy; the other, to the public at
large.”
The
second document is worth quoting extensively because it
is where Lozada recounts his kidnapping, a heinous crime
that the administration seems to have succeeded in
burying thus far. We can’t allow that to happen, can
we?
So here,
to refresh your memory, are the facts of the case, as
recounted by Lozada:
“I left
Manila for Hong Kong upon the instruction of the Office
of the Executive Secretary with the person of Deputy
Executive Secretary [Manuel] Gaite arranging the
ante-dating of my documents with DENR Secretary Lito
Atienza to legitimize my travel to avoid my appearance
at the Senate last January 29, 2008. . . .
“[W]hen
I came back to Manila last February 5, 2008, I was taken
forcibly by unidentified men led by a man which [sic] I
would know later as General [Angel] Atutubo, the
assistant general manager of the Naia for security, the
same man who made a slashing gesture on his neck when
[he] turned around to face the CCTV [closed-circuit]
camera at the Naia. I was brought by these mystery men
to Cavite and Laguna with intention to kill me and
silence me for good. . . .
“I was
forced to write in my own handwriting an official
request for security addressed to the chief [of the] PNP
Gen. Sonny Razon by the unidentified men upon
instruction given over the phone by their superior, who
was the same person who angrily told me to stop texting
my location and turn off my phone, who introduced
himself to me as George. I remembered Secretary Atienza
calling up the man and asked that the phone be handed to
me, to tell me that everything is ok and that I am free
to go home; then Secretary [Romulo] Neri called me up as
well to tell me to calm down my wife because it was
creating a media hype already. But my captors had a
different idea, they brought me instead to Libis, Quezon
City, and there I met a lawyer hired by Deputy Executive
Secretary Gaite of Malacañang to draft my false
affidavit; and be forced to sign it under duress of Col.
Paul Mascariñas of the PNP the following day, while at
the same time, [Director] General Razon, the PNP chief,
was busy changing his story of where I was and how I
ended up in their custody, up until the very end when I
spoke with Mike Defensor who was convincing me to have a
press conference to deny that I was abducted and deny
any involvement with the NBN-ZTE deal, kasi
nasasaktan na si Mam, o kung kokontra ka eh ‘tatrabuhin
ka lang naman namin sa media!,’ a threat which is in
full steam and venom right now, courtesy of Malacañang
mercenaries disguised as journalists and their
special-operatives handlers. This highly paid group has
successfully buried the kidnapping and attempted rub-out
case under a rubble of lies that they unceasingly
manufacture against me, from poison letters, komiks,
media attacks to black-propaganda special operatives,
waiting to pounce on every opportunity they can to
destroy the trust that the public may have given me.”
In a
letter sent to the Black and White Movement, (Blacknwhitemovement.blogspot.com)
Lozada asked six questions that have, so far, remained
unanswered:
“1. Who
ordered them to abduct me from the airport last February
5?
“2. If I
was truly a VIP, why were they not identifying
themselves when I was asking them who they were?
“3. Why
did they bring me to Slex toward Cavite, then to Laguna
when I was telling them to bring me home to
Pasig?
“4. Why
was General Razon lying to the public that I and my
sister had written a request for security when we did
not? Why did he change his story three times?
“5. Why
did Undersecretary Gaite give me P500,000 pesos, and why
did the Palace have three different stories to explain
this?
“6. Why
did Undersecretary Gaite give me a lawyer without my
consent, who wanted me to sign a false affidavit?”
The
Lozada kidnapping, abduction, attempted murder—call it
what you will—crosses the line. The Supreme Court may
have, in the Neri decision, given the Palace a wide
latitude in covering up crimes, but I don’t think the
High Court’s loose interpretation of executive privilege
included “executive action.”
Buencamino is a fellow of Action for Economic Reforms (www.aer.ph). |