|
Corruption is at the core of all developmental
constraints in the Philippines, spinning a web of
problems that entangle government efforts and cocoon our
growth.
A recent
paper titled “Philippines:
Critical Development Constraints” published by the Asian
Development Bank (ADB) painted in detail this dark
picture of corruption in the country.
In gist,
the paper argued that corruption lowers investment
confidence and lessens tax revenues which, in turn,
means fewer resources for infrastructure, social
services and economic services.
When
contrasted with other countries with similar economic
performance, the Philippines is among the most corrupt.
Unfortunately, we have been slow at combating
corruption—our country has remained at the bottom spot
in terms of controlling corruption since 1996.
This
incompetence at containing corruption has deterred our
economic growth in terms of investments and market
sustainability. We have among the lowest foreign direct
investments in
Southeast Asia, and our industrial base is narrow and small compared
with other economies in the region.
This,
coupled with poor tax administration, robs the
government’s coffers of badly needed revenue, resulting
in fewer resources for infrastructure investments and
social and economic services. Social services as a
percentage of gross domestic product dipped from 6.5
percent in 1997 to 4.7 percent in 2005, while economic
services were halved during the same period.
It’s no
wonder why we are lagging behind in poverty alleviation.
In the region, inequality is most prevalent in the
Philippines. At 0.45, we belong to countries with the
highest Gini coefficient (a measure of statistical
dispersion most prominently used as a measure of
inequality of income distribution or inequality of
wealth distribution. Zero corresponds to perfect
equality [everyone having exactly the same income] and 1
corresponds to perfect inequality.)
To
address corruption, the ADB has proposed two key
measures, including the computerization of election
returns to restore credibility in the electoral process.
In a
country where corruption is rampant, syndicated and
structural, computerizing elections is a significant
step toward restoring peoples’ faith in elections. But
more than that is needed.
Structural problems demand surgical solutions. A
political-party system that tolerates corruption and
turncoatism needs not only computers, it demands a major
overhaul.
In the
Senate, I have filed the Political Party Development
Act, which aims to develop, support and strengthen
political parties in the country and hinder turncoatism.
The bill
seeks to help fund political parties in their
platform-based activities all year round, and bars
politicians from changing parties for the sake of
political expediency. It also introduces more
transparency in campaign finance.
Through
this bill, we hope to initiate a series of systemic
changes that will lead to a more mature and democratic
political-party system in the country. |