HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • ‘Disappeared’ rice probed
     
    By Carlos D. Marquez Jr. and Jonathan Mayuga
    Correspondents

    “DISAPPEARED” cheap government rice may just surface again—or at least their whereabouts could be traced—after an investigation was begun on two National Food Authority (NFA) officials in Cagayan Valley region, who were asked to take leaves of absence pending completion of the inquiry.

    The disappearance of the government rice in the market has caused a mild panic even among employees of the NFA, who earlier expressed suspicion the culprits who hid the rice were fellow employees.

    They said government rice is usually sold illegally to big traders (an illegal practice that in the jargon of the NFA is known as ‘diversion’), who then remill them to convert the rice into commercial rice that is sold some P8 to P10 higher than the government rice.

    NFA Region 2 manager Danilo Pastrana and NFA Isabela provincial chief Alfredo Paguila filed their respective indefinite leaves of absence late last week amid the confusion in various Luzon markets, as well as within the NFA offices on the whereabouts of the rice.

    NFA public affairs director Rex Estoperez said the two, “known for their tested integrity,” could shed light on, and vindicate the agency, from the “diversion” scandal.

    In Central Luzon where “diversion” is also reportedly rampant, NFA regional manager Nicolas Crisostomo deployed “Palengke [market] Watch” teams to monitor the retailers to find out if they are selling their allocation—given at P18.25 a kg—to commercial traders. A Bigasang Bayan outlet is allotted 10 bags of 50-kg sack of NFA rice; and accredited individual retailers, five bags each.

    “This is one precautionary measure that will surely discourage any attempt and prevent traders from being tempted by any misdoings,” said Crisostomo.

    He added that as an additional precaution, they also repack the rice allocations of accredited retailers in 1-kg packs and deliver these right to the outlets escorted by NFA personnel.

    As this developed, rice industry watchers predicted that rice prices will reach up to P36 per kilo soon if the present trend in the world market continues and if the government fails to address the domestic agricultural problems, including the rice scandal.

    On the legislative front, the militant fisherfolk group Pambansang Lakas ng Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya) is urging lawmakers to investigate the lack of rice in the market, which has lifted prices to near unaffordable levels. They are worried prices will continue to rise.

    In Metro Manila, the price of regular and well-milled rice increased by P2 to P5 a kilo, with some rice retailers complaining the cost of a sack of rice they regularly buy at P1,200 now costs P1,500.

    Pamalakaya national chairman Fernando Hicap suggested a congressional inquiry to determine the true inventory of stocks—including imported rice—of the NFA, which reported it had more than enough to tide over the country over the lean months of June to September.

    He rejected reducing imported rice tariffs because it would further strengthen the powerful rice cartel and give unscrupulous government officials more opportunity for kickbacks. “Rice is an P80-billion local industry. Those who control the local production, as well as the importation of rice, will surely control local and national politics, since rice is a highly sensitive and politically explosive product.” 

    He added, “Malacañang and the Department of Agriculture want to kill the local rice production in the country by deluding the people with rice imports at the expense of local farmers and the food security of the nation. Increasing dependence on rice imports is not and will never be a solution to this ongoing rice crisis confronting the people.”

    He said the Department of Agriculture (DA) should present a master list of all local rice traders, importers and retailers and tell the public how they work as far as procurement, distribution, marketing and retailing of rice is done.

    According to Hicap, the current rice situation also calls for a second look of the 1995 Senate report on the rice cartel issued at the height of the rice crisis that year, since the names and operations of the rice cartel, known as the Binondo 7, had been substantially identified by the Senate probers.

    Hicap said the DA should also present the state of rice production in the country, particularly the policy of land use conversion, and disclose how many hectares of rice lands were converted into golf courses and other nonrice commercial and industrial use and the prospect of reclaiming these lands and reconverting these lands to rice production.

    Lastly, Hicap said lawmakers should investigate how the national government through Malacañang and the DA spent the P20-billion Agricultural and Fisheries Modernization Fund (Acef), including the P4.2-billion Ginintuang Masaganang Ani Fund, which was meant to procure 407,000 sacks of hybrid rice seeds and 225,000 sacks of certified rice seeds last year to boost rice production in 2007 and 2008.

    OTHER STORIES

    Oil prices may fuel inflation


    GMA touts 17% revenue hike, reforms


    Power shortage in Visayas seen


    ‘Disappeared’ rice probed


    Debate on rice-tariff cut rages


    66% of Filipinos don’t feel impact of economic growth


    External debt up to $55B in 2007: BSP


    Future of tourism: Health-tels, online access


    SMB budgets on ICT seen to hit $3B