HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • Subsidy, not tariff
    rate cut, eyed for rice
     
    By Jun Vallecera and Butch Fernandez
    Reporters

    THE Department of Finance (DOF) has ruled out any tariff rate cut on rice imports, but a parallel plan to increase the subsidy on the staple is in the works.

    The magnitude of the subsidy has not been revealed, but Finance Secretary Margarito Teves said Agriculture Secretary Arthur Yap is being consulted on measures that the DOF may take to help ease reported rice- supply restrictions.

    In separate developments, three senators proposed a range of options, both short- and medium-term, to ease supply, stabilize prices and sustain rice production.

    Senate Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel Jr. sought a review of the rice-procurement policy in light of the tight supply and soaring prices of the staple in the world market. He cited reports that from $295 per metric ton (MT) last year, the price of rice has shot up more than $500 per MT this year.

    Economic affairs committee chairman Loren Legarda urged the use of two multibillion-peso agricultural funds to help farmers boost production. And the chairman of the trade and commerce panel, Sen. Mar Roxas II, recommended the immediate release of local government unit (LGU) calamity funds to help provide farmers with seeds, fertilizers and pesticides in order to ensure enough rice supply in the next harvest.

    Both Teves and Yap have stressed the continued adequacy of rice supply in the country no matter that private interests have benefited from perceptions of an allegedly tight supply of the commodity.

    “We will increase the tax-expenditure subsidy on rice in consultation with Agriculture Secretary Arthur Yap. This is in lieu of a tariff rate cut,” Teves said just before the nation went on an extended Lenten holiday.

    There is an ongoing discussion as to whether or not private importers may also be given the privilege to import rice at a reduced rate, he quickly added.

    Teves said rice importers now pay a 50-percent tariff for the commodity for which the National Food Authority (NFA) has built a 55-day buffer stock equal to 1.8 million MT.

    The estimated rice inventory encompasses government, commercial and even household stock of the commodity, according to Yap.

    This was on top of an estimated 7.2 million metric tons (MMT) seen harvested in granaries across the country between April and May this year, Yap added.

    The expected dry crop harvest in the first half this year should hit 7 MMT versus only 6.7 MMT last year, he said.

    In pushing a review of the rice procurement policy, Pimentel warned that the government stands to lose a lot of money from the transaction because it has to sell the imported rice to consumers at subsidized and low prices despite the expensive import cost of the commodity.

    Teves, meanwhile, said the temporary tax-expenditure subsidy on rice should help the government balance the year’s budget again, something that Fred Neumann, economist at HSBC, strongly doubted would happen this year.

    Under the plan, the Bureau of Customs will draw from the tax-expenditure fund the equivalent tariff that the NFA should normally have paid in cash.

    The NFA, along with 13 other monitored government-owned corporations, normally incurs a deficit as its sells fairly expensive imported rice at a discount to help stabilize not just the supply of the staple but also its price.

    Teves said he also urged the Land Bank of the Philippines to increase its lending allocation for the NFA this year to help ease the situation.

    Relatedly, Pimentel asked the NFA to buy more locally-produced rice instead of relying on imports, as he lamented that the Philippines remained heavily dependent on rice imports to make up for deficiency in local palay production.

    This year alone, the government is importing 2.1 MMT of rice from Thailand, Vietnam and other countries, Pimentel said, noting that the Department of Agriculture targets rice production to reach 17.33  MMT, equivalent to a national sufficiency level of 92 percent.

    He thinks the NFA should beef up its rice stockpile by giving priority to the procurement of rice from local farmers, instead of relying too much on imports, saying  local farmers are always complaining they were being ignored by the NFA in its rice procurement in favor of imports that only benefit the farmers from rice-exporting neighboring countries. “The authorities find it more convenient to buy rice from other countries. Is it because they stand to gain a lot of money from this scheme?” he asked.

    Pimentel noted that the magnitude of the problem was clearly shown in the diversion of 120,000 metric tons of NFA rice to grains cartels in Northern Mindanao.

    Sen. Loren Legarda also warned that an impending rice crisis would be “politically explosive” and urged the government to boldly push new strategies for the country to become self-sufficient in the staple in 24 to 36 months.

    Legarda noted that rice prices soared to a new 34-year high. Ironically, the fresh surge was set off by the Philippines, which on March 18 awarded a tender for rice at $708 per metric ton (about P30 per kilo), up nearly 50 percent from the price it paid in late January.

    She proposed that over the next 24 to 36 months, the government should use two multibillion-peso funds entirely, if not almost exclusively, for projects to immediately advance rice production. She was referring to the Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Program, which has an annual allotment of P17 billion, and the Agricultural Competitiveness Enhancement Fund, which had a cash balance of P6 billion as of December 2007.

    “These funds can be tapped to enable rice farmers to achieve greater productivity via exceptionally potent seeds, greatly improved irrigation, or with adequate water-impounding structures and other drought-mitigating measures,” Legarda said. “The funds can also be used to build up postharvest facilities, so as to curb extensive losses due to inefficient rice processing, particularly in the drying, milling and storage stages,” she added.

    This developed as Sen. Mar Sen. rebuked Malacańang officials over the weekend for belittling the scope of the worsening rice crisis. “Mrs. President, be a force for good by getting real. The government is in denial. We have a food crisis. Economics 101 says prices will rise if supply is tight. We have reached P24 to P26 a kilo of regular rice from P20 to P22. This is because of tight supply.”

    “While declaring that we have no rice shortage, President Arroyo said prices would increase. How can this be? If there is no shortage, why will prices go up? Is it now the policy of government to make retail prices go up? Is the government now admitting that there is hoarding and manipulation and that it is helpless?” he asked.

    OTHER STORIES

    Subsidy, not tariff rate cut, eyed for rice


    RP loses $1.4B annually from poor sanitation–WB


    1.5-B Aspac folks don’t have toilets


    Update, post reference values, BOC told


    Government taking ‘targeted and prudent’ steps


    BTr firm on negotiated sales


    BNPP option still hangs: DOE


    RP at risk of FATF reinstatement?


    Bigger Naia departure area


    SC junks Manila Hotel bid to run Naia 3


    Arroyo bats for RP veggie noodles


    ‘Mark Earth Hour on March 29’