|
THE
Court of Appeals (CA) has acquitted former Oriental
Mindoro congressman Jose Villarosa and three others of
the double-murder case filed against them in connection
with the killing of the two sons of his political rival,
Ricardo Quintos, on December 13, 1997.
In a
118-page decision penned by Associate Justice Noel Tijam,
the CA’s Fifth Division “affirmed in part and reversed
in part” the February 3, 2006, ruling of Branch 81 of
the Regional Trial Court in Quezon City convicting seven
individuals, including Villarosa, for the murder of
brothers Michael and Paul Quintos.
It noted
that the killing of the Quintos brothers was not
politically motivated but may have something to do with
the feud between the Quintos family and their farmers
who have been asserting their claims over the Golden
Country Farms Inc. (GCFI).
The
appellate court affirmed the lower court’s decision
insofar as it found guilty beyond reasonable doubt
accused-appellants Eduardo Hermoso, Manolito Matricio
and Josue Ungsod of two counts of murder, qualified by
treachery, with aggravating circumstance of evident
premeditation.
The CA
also modified their penalty from death to reclusion
perpetua, or a maximum of 40 years in jail, for each
count of murder owing to the abolition of the capital
punishment.
“Conspiracy, having been established, accused-appellants
Hermoso, Matricio and Ungsod shall each suffer a
threefold penalty of reclusion perpetua for each count
of murder,” the CA said.
It,
likewise, ordered the three to jointly pay the Quintoses
the amount of P728,464 as actual, moral and exemplary
damages.
The
court noted that there was an animosity between the
Quintos family and the farmers who have laid their claim
as beneficiaries of the GCFI farm that triggered the
killing.
Hermoso
admitted that the land he was tilling was owned by the
Quintos family and was given to him through the
agrarian-reform program of the government, but has yet
to be transferred to his name.
Matricio,
on the other hand, was an officer of the Samahang
Magsasaka ng Kanlurang Mindoro, composed of farmers who
have been fighting for their rights over the lands they
are tilling. Ungsod was a member of the said group.
“There
have also been allegations of abuses committed by
Ricardo Quintos against the farmers…taking these
circumstances together with the other evidence pointing
to accused-appellants Hermoso, Matricio and Ungsod as
the culprits, this court is convinced that they had a
sufficiently plausible motive to kill the victims,” the
CA said.
The
appellate court, on the other hand, acquitted and
ordered the release of Villarosa, Ruben Balaguer, Gelito
Bautista and Mario Tobias for lack of evidence to
establish their guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
It also
enjoined the director of the New Bibilid Prisons (NBP)
to inform the court whether Villarosa, who is reportedly
suffering from lung cancer, is still confined at the
Makati Medical Center
or had been returned to the NBP.
In
acquitting the appellants, the CA noted that the
circumstantial evidence relied upon by the lower court
in convicting Villarosa and the three other appellants
consists merely of familiarity and motive which are
“insufficient” to conclusively establish a connection
between the former congressman and the murder of the
Quintoses.
Such
circumstantial evidence, according to the CA, was not
even enough to corroborate the extrajudicial confession
of Hermoso linking Villarosa in the Quintoses’ murder.
Hermoso
claimed that Villarosa conspired in the killing of the
Quintos brothers when he took part in the October 7,
1997, meeting in a bodega in Sablayan, during which the
murder was planned.
However,
the court noted that the House of Representatives’
Journal 23 dated October 7, 1997, showed that Villarosa
was in Congress from 5:15 to
7 p.m. on
October 7, 1997, defending a bill he sponsored.
The
appellate court stressed that the Journal corroborated
Villarosa’s claim that he was a long way from
Mindoro when the supposed meeting took place.
“The
burden of proving and establishing the guilt of the
accused rests on the prosecution. Their conviction must
be based on the strength of the prosecution evidence and
not on the weakness of the defense. In this case, we are
constrained to conclude that the prosecution has not
discharged its burden sufficiently, with respect to
accused-appellants Villarosa, Balaguer, Bautista and
Tobias,” the CA said.
The CA
noted that Hermoso’s extrajudicial confession linking
Villarosa, Balaguer, Bautista and Tobias was not
sufficient to support their conviction. The appellate
court noted that such confession should be corroborated
by independent evidence which could prove their guilt
beyond reasonable doubt.
The CA
further said that it is constrained to exculpate
Villarosa and the three other accused, considering that
even the Office of the Solicitor General admitted in its
manifestation that the prosecution failed to discharge
its burden of proving their guilt beyond reasonable
doubt.
“The
political dispute between Villarosa and Ricardo Quintos,
or Villarosa’s association with Matricio, did not place
Villarosa in the conspiratorial meetings or in the scene
of the crime. Indeed, the prosecution presented no
independent physical or testimonial evidence that could
connect Villarosa to the crime or its preparatory
stages,” the CA noted.
Villarosa’s lawyer Estelito Mendoza welcomed the CA’s
decision, saying that “it’s a well-deserved win” since
the prosecution failed to present evidence during the
trial that could have convicted him.
But
Mendoza noted that the violation of his client’s right
to be presumed innocent until proven guilty has been
highlighted by the CA ruling.
Mendoza
said the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), which
investigated the case, had already a preconceived notion
that Villarosa was responsible for the killing of the
Quintos brothers, which led them to focus their efforts
on him.
“All of
those involved in criminal cases, from the Supreme Court
to the prosecution, should be able to solve this
problem,” Mendoza said.
Concurring with the ruling were Associate Justice Martin
Villarama and Sesinando Villon.
Court
records showed that the Quintos brothers were attending
a friend’s birthday part on
Del Pilar Street,
barangay Cinco, Mamburao, Occidental Mindoro, when they
were fired at by the accused.
Michael
and Paul died of multiple gunshot wounds in the body. |