|
Since
the 2005 World Trade Organization (WTO) ministerial
conference in Hong Kong, the Philippines—as a key member
of the so-called G-20 and Nama 11—has maintained that
negotiations for new multilateral trade modalities
should be sequential with agriculture going ahead first,
followed by industrial goods and services.
This
time, however, the Philippines is ready to support calls
for simultaneous talks in agriculture, nonagriculture
market access (Nama) and services as long as this would
make the process faster and lead to the conclusion of
the Doha Development round.
“That’s
what we’re mulling over. Maybe it is better we know
where everybody stands at the same time,” Trade Senior
Undersecretary Thomas Aquino said.
Aquino
said this matter should be decided by trade ministers in
the “ministerial signaling meeting” that some countries
are proposing, which could possibly to take place within
the month.
“That
can only be known there at the ministerial signaling;
the general drift. Let’s hope they speak up. That would
be a lot easier for us,” he said.
G-20,
composed of countries seeking to ensure that for the
Doha Round to be true to its developmental agenda, the
new multilateral rules on agriculture, giving
preferential treatment to developing countries, should
be set first before anything else.
The Nama
11, on the other hand, are pushing for better market
access for developing nations to the rich countries.
Aquino
said if the sequential nature of negotiations that was
set in Hong Kong will be followed, services should not
be tackled yet until agriculture and Nama has moved.
Right
now, however, Aquino said there appears to be an active
entry of services in the picture.
This, he
said, is because every body seems to know already the
state of play in both agriculture and Nama.
Surely,
if the
Philippines
decides to drop its G-20 and Nama stance, Aquino said
several sectors in the country would be raising their
arms in opposition. |