|
PHILIPPINE Long Distance Telephone Co. (PLDT) is
insisting on its right to collect transport charge, or
fees for carrying calls, from Philippine Telegraph and
Telephone Corp. (PT&T).
The
phone giant reminded PT&T that the latter should
shoulder the cost of the transmission link from PLDT’s
side based on the number of trunks coming from PT&T LEC
(local exchange carrier) area connected to a PLDT tandem
exchange outside the PT&T-assigned service area.
This is
stated in the interconnection agreement both parties
signed in December 1995, PLDT said. The fee for each
trunk is P500.
PT&T,
however, wants PLDT to stop billing the Santiago-owned
firm on the basis of a provision of the NTC’s circular
entitled “Rules on Interconnection of LEC in local
calling areas” that was issued in July last year.
PT&T
understood that the P519,120 monthly access charge being
billed by PLDT against PT&T for all trunks that
interconnect both exchanges in the 02 service area will
no longer be billed because of a provision which states
that “both PT&T and PLDT shall honor rent free… which
refers to LEC-LEC access outside PT&T service area, but
within the same ‘02’ calling area.”
Accordingly, PT&T asked PLDT to amend their
interconnection agreement.
But PLDT
said there is no need to amend the agreement because the
NTC circular does not mean the cancellation of the
monthly bills PLDT sends to PT&T.
“PLDT
does not impose transport charge in common service areas
and only do so when PLDT has to transport traffic for
PT&T from the POI [point of interconnection] to several
of PLDT’s tandem switches in different areas outside of
PT&T’s service area. This is exactly what the
circular provides,” said PLDT lawyer Fernando Sobierra
III.
The
phone giant said that PT&T wants to amend their
agreement so as not to pay its dues. “Basically, PT&T
wants to amend paragraph 8.1.2 of the interconnection
agreement in order to justify its nonpayment of the
transport charges as provided therein,” added the PLDT
official.
PLDT
said that industry players accept the concept of
transport charge as the fees are designed to pay a
company for its facilities that carry calls from another
network.
For
areas where a carrier has no physical presence and must
rely on existing facilities of an established carrier,
payment is necessary for maintenance and expansion
costs.
“Removing the right to charge transport cost results in
the unfair sharing of responsibilities between parties,
thereby depriving the incumbent from earning appropriate
returns on capital invested,” said PLDT. |