|
I had
always thought that the extension of the PNCC franchise
would be a walk in the park, what with no less than
former Quezon City representative Maite Defensor of the
politically powerful Defensor clan which includes
father, Mat, who replaced her; brother, senatorial
candidate and former Presidential Chief of Staff Mike;
aunt, the Senadora Miriam; and uncle, House Deputy
Majority Leader Arthur, among others, riding shotgun
over the country’s sole tollways franchisee.
But that
has not turned out to be so. With Congress now out on
election recess, the PNCC franchise, which is due to
expire next month, will probably be left to wither and
wait for the incoming 14th Congress to be revived. This
will definitely impact negatively on the company’s
standing and derail its upgrading into a world-class
toll- ways owner and operator. How PNCC’s fortunes
skidded to this sorry impasse should be one hell of a
story.
But if
reports from the grapevine are to be believed, the PNCC
got into this rut solely because of the mysterious
P17-billion “Radstock” deal.
Apparently, while the House Committee on Franchises,
chaired by Bukidnon Rep. and now senatorial candidate
Miguel “Migs” Zubiri passed the PNCC bill in a jiffy, it
was stalled in the Senate over the objections of Sen.
Frank Drilon. The Iloilo senator disclosed that the
P17-billion “compromise” agreement between PNCC and
Radstock Securities, which was initialed during the Erap
years and firmed up under the watch of former NDC and
PNCC president, now Transco head honcho Art Aguilar,
smelled to high heavens.
In the
first place, except for former agriculture secretary
Sonny Dominguez (also of Lafayette and Rapu-Rapu Mining
fame), who has been identified as the Radstock man in
the papers, the Bermuda-based company’s provenance
remains a puzzle. Even more puzzling is the
metamorphosis of its claim which apparently took almost
a decade to surface and its multibillion “compromise”
agreement with the publicly listed, financially
challenged PNCC.
Too,
PNCC failed to satisfactorily argue that the said
“compromise” deal should take precedence over all other
obligations, including its P38-billion debt with the
national government. Even the most loyal PNCC advocate
in the Senate failed to sway Drilon over those
objections, thus sinking the company’s chances to have
its franchise pass congressional muster.
What a
queasy, roller-coaster ride indeed. And what a whale of
a correction waits if PNCC hopes to have its franchise
renewed
Recto’s
‘corrections’
Speaking
of corrections, we are not surprised that “Co-Recto” is
the tagline of re-electionist Sen. Ralph Recto’s
political ad.
A play
on the Recto name it is meant to convey approval by a
slew of people who have presumably been affected by the
youthful solon’s various initiatives, a number of which
quite controversial, since the time he entered that
chamber in 2001 after serving three terms in the House.
In his
six years at the Senate, Recto has indeed become the
go-to guy for any corrective measures, especially in
critical, nay controversial, matters involving the
economy.
The more
controversial ones, if we may call them such, have
everything to do with Recto’s efforts at correcting, as
it were, the country’s highly complicated and, may I
add, oftentimes antipoor and antipeople, fiscal regime.
It is this regime, which has, in more ways than one,
consigned the country to the margins of development.
As the
chairman of the
Senate Ways
and Means Committee this Herculean job of leveling the
playing field and going after the special interests
embedded in the country’s Jurassic internal revenue and
Customs and tariff codes fell squarely on his shoulders.
It has been a lonely and oftentimes thankless task.
But, to
his and his more conscientious colleagues’ credit, this
task has turned out to be rewarding not only for them
but even, more importantly, to the Filipino people. In
fact, even those persons and sectors who were initially
apprehensive, if not openly critical, of many of these
initiatives later on became the most vocal advocates of
the fiscal reform packages which Recto nursed through
the legislative mill.
No
wonder, even the most discerning economists and policy
makers at the ADB, World Bank, European Union, the
ratings agencies and, yes, the giant international
financial houses, have only praises for his steady,
balancing acts which have spawned in its wake the most
far-reaching overhaul and modernization of our financial
and fiscal environment.
It is
this reform initiative which has in the process ignited
a revolution of sorts in key sectors of the economy.
Now, the country is on track to balance its budget,
substantially reduce its debt stock and, essentially,
clear its standing in the international financial
market.
More
importantly, this reform package, this correction, if
you will, opens up the public’s appreciation of the real
and critical role of public finance in the nation’s
affairs. Not only will this result in fair and equitable
taxation but focused, results-oriented spending of the
people’s monies.
Which is
why it pains us to hear some sectors going out of their
way to intentionally demonize Recto for his reform and
corrective initiatives without as much saying that the
same has resulted in a more balanced, equitable and
responsible fiscal management.
It is
Recto, for example, who has been the moderating voice in
the fiscal-incentives rationalization effort ensuring in
the process that only those industries and sectors truly
deserving government assistance get such assistance and
only for as long as they undertake projects in priority,
job-generating and export-enhancing areas.
It is
Recto who has stomped the efforts of the big
money-making machines and industries to wiggle their way
out of paying their fair and just share in taxes through
loopholes in the revenue code. It is Recto who has been
able to see through the schemes of the decades-old
“sunshine” industries to stay in that category forever
and get incentives in the process almost as a right
already. It is Recto’s corrective ways which has saved
Juan de la Cruz from a regime of fiscal inequity and
marginalization.
“Co-Recto” indeed and how! |