HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING

SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    ‘Go ahead at your own peril’
     
    By Butch Fernandez
    Reporter

    PROCEED at your own risk.

    This was the warning aired by members of a joint congressional oversight panel amid plans by the Commission on Elections to go ahead with voting via internet in Singapore during the May 14 mid-term elections, despite concerns over the absence of a law that would allow the exercise to be legally conducted by the Comelec.

    At a public hearing Tuesday, Sen. Richard Gordon, committee chairman, warned that the Comelec could be charged with, among others, technical malversation of public funds if it proceeds to spend, without an appropriate law, P23 million to conduct Internet voting for some 26,000 Filipino voters based in Singapore.

    Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile observed that the Comelec may overstep its authority should it ignore the misgivings of members of the oversight committee and insist on Internet voting.

    “While the Comelec has jurisdiction over electoral exercises, it must abide by the rules enacted by Congress,” Enrile explained, saying Comelec officials are taking a risk if they go ahead with Internet voting without a clear mandate.

    Appearing before the oversight committee, former Comelec chairman Christian Monsod maintained that the poll body had no legal basis for conducting Internet voting. Monsod said the Comelec would be setting “a very dangerous precedent” in relying on what he called a “general authority” to justify its insistence on holding Internet voting.

    “The Comelec relies on the absentee voting law where nothing authorizes it to conduct Internet voting,” Monsod said, adding that one provision in the supposed authority cited by Comelec allows it only to study and report on the possibility of holding voting via Internet, but not to implement it right away as Comelec wants to do. He added that another provision in the absentee voting law allowed transmitting results of the counting of votes by Internet but not voting itself.

    OTHER STORIES

    Next: Meralco, SMC privatization


    GMA’s 5-point strat for next wave of reforms


    And now, it’s ‘7-8-9’ GDP growth


    Tax amnesty, PERA okayed


    ICTSI eyes 2 more ports in Asia, LatAm


    Napocor hopes to keep financial gains in ’07


    Central bank watches with caution as rates keep sliding


    Comelec insists internet voting has legal basis


    ‘Go ahead at your own peril’


    Clark terminal rebid set Feb.


    Fuller Life upbeat on reentry into RP


    3 bidders prequalify for LRT north extension project