|
No one
likes hearing “No,” and few can resist pushing
back—sometimes quite persistently. Roger Fisher,
negotiation expert and coauthor of the widely influential
book ‘Getting to Yes’, used to tell his law students that
sometimes he wished he had written a book about getting to
no and staying there. When disappointed family members or
colleagues pushed back at his no, he would sometimes give
up and give in.
Like
Fisher, most of us find ourselves torn between our wish to
stay with no and our desire to accommodate the person
asking us for something. This tension is particularly
acute when that person is a valued client or a senior
colleague.
When we
say no and find ourselves pressured to unsay it, we can of
course just give in. But giving in, especially when it
becomes a habit, can seriously damage our credibility and
effectiveness as professionals. Here is how to say no in a
way that both conveys your resolve and preserves your
relationships.
USE A
NEUTRAL NO
To say no
and stay with it requires defusing emotion on both sides:
our discomfort at staying with an unpopular no and our
counterpart’s irritation, disappointment or anger at
hearing it. Use a neutral no to turn down the emotional
temperature.
A neutral
no is steady, uninflected and clear. It’s mostly
illustrated by what it’s not. It’s not harsh, it’s not
pugnacious or apologetic, it’s not reluctant or heavily
buffered and it’s not overly nice. Neutral and nice are
not the same. Even if you’re nice, use neutral to stay
with no. By sticking with neutral, you’re concentrating on
the business end of no, not the personal.
You want a
referee’s manner. A ref just says what he says—good news
for some, bad news for others—regardless of the strong
feelings on both sides that his message may inspire. His
job is to give his message neutrally and stay with it
neutrally if challenged.
A neutral
manner doesn’t prevent you from speaking directly about
the friction your no creates. “It’s hard for me to tell
you no; it must be hard for you to hear” is consistent
with neutral. If you know or suspect why your counterpart
is resisting your no, acknowledge his concern honestly but
without giving hope. “You have a lot invested in what
you’re asking, and it looks like I’m personally blocking
you.” Give a reason or justification for your no. “I see
my job as balancing valid, but competing, needs. I’m
focusing on that.”
BE
CONSISTENT
When
explaining why you’re saying no, don’t volley different
arguments with your counterpart. This just confuses both
of you. If you have time to prepare for this conversation,
have a consistent, cogent argument at the ready.
In some
cases, you may want to tell your counterpart what you
could say yes to. That’s not a foundation of staying with
no, it’s an option and the beginning of a negotiation. If
you’re open to that, you don’t have to wait for the
counterpart to ask.
EXPLAIN
THE REAL REASON YOU’RE SAYING NO
Sometimes
people hold back from explaining the real reason for their
no, substituting instead lighter-weight reasons that they
think their counterpart will find more palatable. The
problem with this is that their counterpart usually finds
it easy to swat away those lightweight reasons because
they aren’t very persuasive. To limit the frustration on
both sides, give reasons with good weight up front.
A junior
analyst had been helping out a colleague by taking on some
of his work when he was crunched. The problem was that she
soon became swamped herself and the quality of her work
was suffering. The next time he asked for her customary
help, she said, “I have to say no—I don’t seem to be
managing my time very well right now. ”Her colleague
disagreed; he said he thought she did a great job managing
her time. Not accepting that she had a time-management
problem, her colleague also didn’t accept her
no.
DON’T GIVE
FALSE HOPE
Staying
with no tentatively, or with a show of reluctance, makes
it easy for your counterpart to hope you will change your
no—and hard for him to accept the no. It sounds like your
no is on the edge of tipping over into yes, so your
counterpart is encouraged to keep pushing.
AVOID A
BATTLEFRONT ATTITUDE
Not
everyone tries to soften her no. Some of us say no
combatively, and treat staying with no as escalating
warfare. When staying with no feels like a triumph of the
will, good outcomes—and good judgment—are in jeopardy.
KNOW YOUR
TRIGGERS
Your
counterpart may try out different tactics to get you to
yes your no. Does an ominous suggestion that the union
will hear about this roll off you or rattle you? Do tears
move you to offer a tissue or to fold? Clarifying for
yourself ahead of time where your vulnerabilities lie
helps you resist your counterpart’s tactics.
PRACTICE
STAYING WITH NO
If you
want to get better at staying with no in the face of your
counterpart’s resistance to it, practice with someone who
will play the part of your worst nightmare in a protected
setting. That way, you’ll be well prepared for when a real
situation arises, when a lot is on the line.
Holly
Weeks is a Cambridge, Massachusetts-based communication
consultant and the author of ‘Hard Talks: Mastering
Stressful Conversations with Balance and Skill’ (Harvard
Business School Press, 2008). |