|
PAMPANGA
Gov. Eddie Panlilio on Thursday asked the Supreme Court
to stop the Commission on Elections (Comelec) from
implementing its resolution allowing the election
protest of his political rival, Lilia Pineda, to
proceed.
In a
petition filed through his lawyer Ernesto Francisco Jr.,
Panlilio assailed the Comelec order dated July 23, 2007,
giving due course to Pineda’s poll protest by directing
the revision of ballots pertaining to the protested
4,847 precincts.
Panlilio
is also seeking to declare null and void the August 1,
2007 and February 6, 2008 orders issued by the poll
body’s Second Division, which junked his motions for
reconsideration and to certify his motion for
reconsideration to the Comelec en banc.
He urged
the tribunal to hand down a writ of preliminary
injunction or a temporary restraining order or both
to stop the Comelec from implementing the orders.
Panlilio
said Pineda’s election protest should have been
dismissed outright because, on its face, it is a “sham
protest.”
Panlilio’s lawyer added Pineda’s suit is “based on bare
and general allegations of fraud and
irregularities which, under existing jurisprudence, had
already been held as ‘virtually impossible’ in view of
the presence of watchers stationed at the back of
election inspectors.”
Panlilo
also said “the frivolous, if not ridiculous, character”
of Pineda’s protest is demonstrated by the fact that the
latter is contesting all the precincts in all the towns
and cities in Pampanga, except Angeles City, and even
identified a total of 4,836 precincts in the instant
petition.
He also
noted the questionable payment of P4 million by Pineda
while his motion for reconsideration of the poll body’s
July 23, 2007 motion for reconsideration is still
pending.
“At this
juncture, petitioner respectfully maintains that the
conduct of private respondent and her counsel is highly
unconventional and irregular. Logically speaking, no
counsel or party would effect compliance with an order
requiring payment of millions of pesos when there is
still a pending motion for reconsideration of the said
order. This is because there is always that possibility
that the said order may be reversed or modified,” the
governor added.
He also
said the claim of Pineda that she was cheated in all
4,836 precincts without any objection from her watchers
or without questioning before the Board of Election
Inspectors in the said precincts is a very incredible
and unbelievable.
Panlilio
said Pineda’s counsel resorted what he called a “shotgun
approach” by including all possible grounds for an
election protest without any regard of the fact that
they are absolutely without any factual basis and
understandably, cannot be substantiated. |