HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • AHI status in limbo with regulator
     
    By Emeterio Sd. Perez
    Section Editor

    HAD Amsterdam Holdings Inc. won the controversial and allegedly overpriced $329-million national broadband contract, it could have undertaken its first business since its incorporation in 2002.

    But unluckily for the company, which lost the deal to ZTE Philippines, a subsidiary of ZTE Ltd. Inc. of China, it may lose its certificate of incorporation as a company registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for being nonoperational for five years.

    Apparently, had Amsterdam Holdings not been used by Jose de Venecia III, son of former Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr.,  as his corporate vehicle in bidding for the broadband project, it could have already lost its SEC license as early as last year.

    Under a provision in the general information sheets (GIS) filed annually by private companies with the SEC, a corporation which has not been operating for a period of five years may lose its SEC registration certificate.

    The threat of revocation is contained in the GIS signed on July 25, 2006, by lawyer Katherine N. Gan, assistant corporate secretary of Amsterdam Holdings.

    In going after violations of its reporting rules, the SEC warned corporations that “failure to file GIS for five years shall be construed as nonoperational and a ground for the revocation of the corporations’ certificate of incorporation.”

    Based on the provision of the GIS, which was signed by Gan, Amsterdam Holdings “…waives its right to a hearing for the said revocation.”

    Gan also signed on July 25, 2006, an affidavit of nonoperation when she told the SEC that Amsterdam Holdings “did not hold any annual shareholders’ meeting from August 5, 2002, its date of incorporation.”

    Both the GIS and the affidavit of nonoperation were received by the SEC on July 25, 2006.

    Amsterdam Holdings was registered with the SEC in 2002 but did not have yet a subsidiary like Ayala Corp., which is the majority stockholder of Ayala Land, or JG Summit Inc., the controlling stockholder of Universal Robina Corp.

    There is a reason for this: as of 2006, Amsterdam Holdings had a paid-up capital of a little over P300,000.

    Documents also show that the company has been incurring losses since its formation in 2002. As of end-2006, it had accumulated deficit of P219,163.

    The SEC requires both stock and nonstock corporations to file periodic reports such as GIS, results of annual stockholders’ meetings and audited financial reports. Law offices, accounting firms and other professional practitioners are not covered by these rules.

    Amsterdam’s corporate files submitted in 2006 to the SEC did not contain the name of Jose de Venecia III, son of former Speaker Jose de Venecia.

    Based on its 2006 GIS, Amsterdam Holdings was holding office at Unit 2106, 88 Corporate Center, 141 Valero corner Sedeño Streets, Salcedo Village, Makati City.

    The company’s authorized capital stock consisted of 50,000 common shares, or P5 million at P100 par value. Of these shares, P312,800 have been paid up.

    The GIS listed Nathaniel F. Sauz as the biggest stockholder with P1,249,600 subscribed shares, of which P312,400 was paid up based on par value of P100. Four other stockholders—Rosario A. Sauz, Edwin D. Pastor, Timothy T. Dunque and Amelia G. Blando—own one share each.

    Amsterdam Holdings’ financial report showed it had cash of P2,476,023 as of end-2006, up from P301,650 in 2005 and investments of P1,415,045.

    The financial performance of Amsterdam Holdings was audited by Teodoro R. Nocum of Unit 2106, 88 Corporate Center, 141 Valero corner Sedeño Streets, Salcedo Village, Makati City.

    OTHER STORIES

    ‘Power cost to drive out business’


    Oil firms eye filing MR with SC on ruling to eject depot


    Strong peso hurts furniture exports; 5,000 jobs lost


    ZTE refuses to attend Senate hearings


    ‘Only the guilty will shun Senate probe’


    AHI status in limbo with regulator


    Assassination plot vs. GMA?


    ‘If I threatened Lozada, why was he playing golf?’


    NTC has no right to hit media on Garci


    US renews warning vs. travel to RP


    US grant to upgrade weather gear