HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • RTC dismisses La Costa suit vs Psalm
     
    By Paul A. Isla
    Reporter

    THE Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Makati has dismissed the case filed by La Costa Development Corp. against the agency tasked to privatize the government’s power generation and transmission assets.

    According to the Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corp. (PSALM), the court dismissed the case for plaintiff’s failure to state a cause of action and for lack of jurisdiction against PSALM and Jose C. Ibazeta, company president.

    La Costa alleged that PSALM disregarded the law and its own bidding rules. It filed the case before the Makati RTC to stop the bidding for the 25-year concession of the National Transmission Corp. (Transco).

    In its decision on February 5, 2008, Branch 61 of the Makati RTC said La Costa “faltered to state a cause against herein defendants PSALM and Ibazeta.”

    Judge J. Cedrick O. Ruiz explained that “La Costa’s allegations of fraud were not specified, which is another translucent badge of an unwholesome intent to go on a ‘fishing expedition,’” and that the complainant even “failed to establish and prove its blanket allegations and motherhood statements on fraud.”

    Entertaining what it called La Costa’s egregious attempt to fish for fraudulent acts may, said the court, “open the floodgates to similar harassment suits filed by disgruntled bidders whose woes are largely self-inflicted.”

    PSALM said the court ruled from the evidence adduced by the parties, quoting a part of the ruling that said, “it becomes perspicuous that PSALM’s action of disqualifying La Costa was founded upon the published and accepted bidding procedures which were previously revealed to the plaintiff herein which bound itself to abide thereby.”

    The court rejected La Costa’s argument that Ibazeta was biased because he knew “a certain ‘Enrique Razon Jr.’ and declared that the fact “that defendant Ibazeta is somehow connected to Enrique Razon Jr. proves nothing.”

    Before his appointment to PSALM, Ibazeta had worked in various capacities in businessman Razon’s group of companies. Mr. Razon is a stakeholder in the consortium that won the bid.

    PSALM had declared the $3.95-billion bid of the consortium led by Monte Oro Grid Resources Corp. (MOGRC), as the winner for being the highest. Although La Costa said earlier it could bid as high as $6 billion, it never got to do so because it was disqualified.

    A selection notice has since been issued to the MOGRC; and an agreement that gives it a one-year period to apply for an obtain a congressional franchise has also been signed. 

    OTHER STORIES

    SC: Oil depot must leave


    Oil firms assure customers of stable supply


    Oil prices, not politics, a risk to biz


    Best gift to a loved one: Good health


    DOF backtracks, taxes Pall Mall P26.06/pack


    JPE hounds Teves at CA


    QC is World Bank’s showcase for taxing informal enterprises


    PAL, CebuPac seek to raise fuel surcharge


    Only $100-M OFW bonds to be sold


    Cebu traders reiterate support vs antigraft drive


    ‘Jpepa will show RP is transparent’


    RTC dismisses La Costa suit vs Psalm