HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING

SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    $1.5B more needed vs bird flu
     
    By Jennifer A.  Ng
    Reporter

    FROM $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion in additional funds are needed to help countries immediately put in place systems for rapid response to a hit by the dreaded avian influenza or bird flu virus, according to the World Bank.

    A year ago, donor countries pledged $1.9 billion to help countries put such systems in place and donors meeting in Bamako, Mali, in December pledged an additional $475 million to bring the total grants to nearly $2.4 billion.

    The WB said spending now on control is worthwhile insurance, since the economic costs of a human pandemic would be enormous—estimated at $1.2 trillion to $2 trillion, as shown by the bank’s simulations of a severe case scenario.

    So far, the human death toll from bird flu remains relatively small. By the end of 2006, the World Health Organization said the total bird flu human cases stood at 261, and the number of deaths at 157.

    The bank said the additional funds will pay for a broad range of activities to strengthen human and animal health services, including the purchase of poultry vaccines, equipment and staff training.

    It would also be used to quickly compensate poor farmers whose poultry are slaughtered because of exposure to bird flu. These payments, according to WB rural strategy advisor Christopher Delgado, will encourage small farmers to report outbreaks. “Compensation is fundamental to animal disease control everywhere, especially in developing countries where you’re reliant on the compliance
    of small farmers for success.”

    He added, “The problem is that in developing countries a lot of livestock and a lot of poultry are kept on very small farms in very remote places. If these producers do not comply with orders to report outbreaks or cooperate in presenting animals for culling when requested, [countries affected] are not going to be successful at disease control.”  

    Data from the Food and Agriculture Organization, over 220 million domestic birds—most owned by poor farmers in developing countries—have died or been culled (selectively slaughtered) in efforts to contain the virus. Economic losses in Southeast Asian poultry alone are estimated at around $10 billion, and culling has cost the African poultry industry $60 million.

    OTHER STORIES

    Psalm board votes to rebid Transco


    $1.5B more needed vs bird flu


    Asean, EU to start FTA talks


    Another foreign group buys 7.7% of PLDT voting shares


    LandBank sets sale of P4-B ROPAs


    Favila warns cement makers


    $200-M oil island mulled


    Smart to pilot phone scheme for remittance 


    BIR vows to remit P730B


    Palm oil fuel additive maker eyes government list