HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • IT BEGAN AND ENDED HERE
    ABALOS BLAMES DE VENECIA DUO

    THE lawyer of resigned Commission on Elections (Comelec) chairman Benjamin Abalos Sr., possibly in consultation with his client, said the testimony of former Philippine Forest Corp. president Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada Jr., before the Senate blue-ribbon committee is part of the machinations to bring down President Arroyo.

           And the mastermind of the sordid affair is none other than House Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr., the lawyer broadly hinted. Lozada had linked Mike Arroyo, the President’s husband, to the now-aborted national broadband network (NBN) deal with China through former Comelec chairman  Abalos, whom Lozada tagged as the intermediary.

                           This strongly worded statement of Abalos counsel Salvador Panelo also put forward the view that “the clear motive of whistle-blowers Lozada and businessman Joey de Venecia III, son of the Pangasinan congressman, is to come out with alleged anomaly in the national broadband network deal to bring down President Arroyo.”

                     Panelo, Abalos’ spokesman as well, also said at an impromptu press meeting Sunday at the Max’s Restaurant at the Edsa Central in Mandaluyong City that “the math is actually easy in pinpointing” Abalos and Mike Arroyo “to generally lead to President Arroyo.”

                    Panelo said: “The motivation, if you will factor in his [Joey’s] father to the case, is to link the First Gentleman. You link the First Gentleman, and the one who will be at the receiving end is his wife. If the buck stops at the wife, that is a very big issue for them. They want to oust the government of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. That’s the entire motivation.”

                    Bad blood between the de Venecias and the family of Abalos arose out of  the  testimony of the young de Venecia at a Senate hearing in September, that linked Abalos to the deal and to an attempted bribery of the then-Neda chief, Romulo Neri.

                    Abalos said the “conspiracy” against him and Mr. Arroyo is very clear as the de Venecias are simply trying to destroy him because of their failure to get the NBN contract for the younger de Venecia, whom he described as having been “bad shot” or out of favor with the Chinese, thus fully revealing his hand in the statements of Panelo.

                    Abalos insisted the younger de Venecia had a $10-million debt to  ZTE for a past telephone-related project that he was never able to settle. During earlier interviews, de Venecia III had denied the accuations.

                    Abalos told reporters that the testimonies of the young de Venecia and last week, Lozada, only goes to show a blatant desperation in linking the ZTE deal with Mr. Arroyo.

                    “As you can see there is a great desperation to link the First Gentleman here. They said I got angry and called him [Mr. Arroyo] up and then the next day, we got a letter from the Chinese Embassy that everything is already okay,” he said.

                    Abalos, in trying to discredit Lozada, said the statement issued by Lozada was “riddled with inconsistencies.”

                    Abalos said Lozada claimed at the Senate hearing that he met the former poll body chairman in September 2006, during which Abalos allegedly tried to force a loan agreement for the NBN project that would include his $130-million kickback.

                    Abalos disputed Lozada’s testimony that a day after the meeting with Abalos—where, he alleged, the former Comelec chief exercised his influence by allegedly calling up Mr. Arroyo to work out the deal—a letter from the Chinese ambassador was sent to Malacañang approving a loan package for the NBN deal.

                    Abalos debunked this claim, showing a copy of the letter dated December 2, 2006, which disproves Lozada’s claim that it was in September.  “You can see from here that Lozada’s statement should crumble.”

                    Meanwhile, Panelo said they will file a P100-million to P200 million libel case against Lozada for directly linking Abalos to the bribes and overpricing in the now-scrapped ZTE contract.

                    Panelo said  all they are waiting for are the response from the Senate, from whom they sought for a copy of the videotape and transcript of Lozada’s testimony. “We are preparing an affidavit complaint against him [Lozada]. We will sue him for libel based on his testimony imputing a crime against Mr. Abalos.”  --C. Mocon 

    OTHER STORIES

    3rd bid for Boni’s best lots set


    IT BEGAN AND ENDED HERE


    ABALOS BLAMES DE VENECIA DUO


    The Jpepa jump-start: Dissecting a treaty


    Flood alert up over La Niña


    Transco told: Divest of STAs


    Govts just huffin’ ‘n puffin’ against evils of smoking


    More couples separating


    Petrochem firm clarifies smuggling case vs Teves at CA


    Moderated inflation tied to VAT


    RP studies farm, Nama positions