|
THE
Manila International Airport Authority (Miaa) closed a
portion of runway 13-31 from January 15 to February 28
for upgrading, a move that has caused traffic congestion
at the
Ninoy
Aquino
International
Airport (Naia).
During the third quarter of 2006, some 300 meters of the
southend portion of the runway was closed for upgrading
at a cost of P300 million.
This
time, the runway’s northern end is also being
refurbished to allow runway 13-31 to accommodate taxiing
large-body aircraft such as B-747, B-777 or Airbus 340.
However, the closure shows that there is not enough area
for airplanes to move about, which taxed to the limit
the air controller’s capacity and in the end, forced
aircraft to wait for some time before they can take off
or land.
More
often, airplanes have had to wait more than 30 minutes
before being given the clearance to take off.
Even
without closing runway 13-31, however, air carrier
executives said there’s still not enough elbow room for
aircraft to maneuver because aircraft volume had
increased in number over the years, while the country’s
premier airport is stuck with one small runway and one
big runway but converging and not parallel in design,
according to the Air Transportation Office (ATO).
Crossing each other like a huge X, the runways are
dangerous to operate simultaneously, especially at night
or in bad weather, because of the possibility of
collision when two aircraft that are about to land on
either runway, continue their course after executing a
mis-approach after failing to see the runway.
Hence, current runway designs are always made parallel
to each other.
This
crossing runway-design problem is a headache not only to
ATO but to the Miaa as well. Naia frequently upgrades
the runway and taxiway facilities, but doesn’t actually
provide increased usable space.
According to aviation sources, air controllers are now
looking for remedial measures to limit aircraft
operations to diminish delays and also to minimize the
chances of air accidents.
An
ATO study shows that air traffic congestion at the Naia
starts at 7 a.m. until 5 p.m., with peak volume reaching
38 aircraft per hour between 3 to 4 p.m.
“Sometimes, we handle 53 aircraft per hour because the
Naia is unique among other airports that we have a
mixture of commercial planes, general aviation,
helicopters, military and small aircraft,” said a source
at the ATO who asked not to be named because of the
sensitive nature of the problem.
In
many international airports abroad such as
Hong
Kong’
Chep Lap Kok, Kansai in
Japan
and others, they only handle commercial aircraft.
General aviation aircraft such as those for air charter,
flying schools, executive jets and helicopters are
located in a separate area far away from the
international operations.
Kansai
Airport,
including other airports abroad, also limits aircraft
operations to a maximum of 30 landings and takeoff per
hour.
Kansai airport practice what is called “slotting” where
the number of takeoff and landings are spread over a
period of time to lessen the volume during peak traffic
hours, despite their having one huge runway, two
taxiways and six rapid-exits.
The
runway 06-24 at the Naia has only two rapid exits and
there are proposals to increase it to four, but the Miaa
authorities are reportedly stunned by the cost of
construction following a briefing by ATO officials.
However, having four rapid-exits at the Naia would
enable air controllers to speed up clearing the runway
of just-landed aircraft by 17 seconds, giving them more
time to process more aircraft.
On
the other hand, constructing these high-speed exits
would entail limiting aircraft movements again, which
the country could ill afford at this time when we are
enticing tourists to come in droves, and proposing an
open-sky policy to bring in more of them into our
shores, according to airport sources.
It is
because of the just mentioned problems that the Naia
belongs to a “level 3” airport, which the International
Air Transport Association (Iata) defines as an airport
that had exceeded its capacity to handle air traffic.
A
“level 1” airport means that there are no restrictions
for air operations, according to an official of the
Airline Operators Council (AOC).
The
AOC official said that the paramount concern of air
traffic controllers is safety and until the airport
officials could find ways to widen the airport compound
beyond its present limits or transfer to the Macapagal-International
Airport in Clark, all those operating out of the Naia
have to bear the burden of long wait before hearing that
much awaited “cleared to land, or cleared for takeoff,”
command from the control tower. |