|
HOPING
the government will realize that the permanent or
temporary removal of the 12-percent value-added tax on
petroleum products spell big relief to consumers, Sen.
Mar Roxas II expressed optimism on Tuesday that the
energy summit called by Malacañang will tackle his
proposal to temporarily suspend the collection of VAT on
oil products for at least six month.
“It’s
the job of the government to reassess or change
solutions when facts change. It’s foolish not to change
medicines when the infection has already morphed into
something else,” Roxas said at the 11th Foreign
Correspondents Association of the
Philippines
(Focap) Conference on the Prospects for the
Philippines.
In a
separate development, the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan
lamented that the administration is more inclined to
listen to the “advice” of the International Monetary
Fund than Filipinos. It noted an IMF paper cited this
week, warning the government that a VAT suspension is
“ill-advised” and will benefit the rich more than the
poor because the rich spend a bigger proportion of their
money on gas. Bayan said the IMF considered only direct
spending on petroleum, and not the domino effect of
every increase in oil prices.
At the
Focap, Roxas said he opposed imposing a VAT on petroleum
products and power services, knowing the pressure it
will have on consumer spending.
Roxas
earlier warned that world oil prices could possibly
surge higher—well past $100 a barrel, citing projections
of Morgan Stanley Inc. that oil could hit $115 per
barrel soon.
“Once
this happens, even the one-percentage reduction in oil
tariffs would not make a dent on people’s wallets. The
question now really is, whether the government should
continue collecting the VAT on oil products, or if the
tax should be suspended to allow our people—consumers—to
keep more money in their pockets at this time of
abnormally high oil prices,” Roxas said.
The
Bagong Alyansang Makabayan [Bayan] also slammed the
government for insisting on maintaining the VAT on oil
products, saying the Arroyo regime chose to listen to
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) instead of the
growing public clamor to suspend the regressive
petroleum tax.
Reports
on Monday quoted an IMF paper describing as
“ill-advised” the call to suspend VAT, as such would
benefit the rich more than the poor, because the rich
spend a higher portion of their income on petroleum
compared to the poor.
Bayan
described as illogical the IMF conclusion, and argued
that every additional centavo spent on oil puts far
greater pressure on the poor’s income than the rich
ones. This makes it meaningless to compare what portion
of the respective income of the poor and the rich
directly goes to oil consumption, Bayan said.
The
group said the IMF survey pertained only to the direct
consumption of petroleum products and did not consider
the domino effect of high and increasing oil prices. A
P1 per liter-hike in oil prices, for instance, increases
the inflation rate by 0.10 to 0.14 percentage points
after a 12-month period, according to the Bangko Sentral
ng Pilipinas (BSP). This means that there is an overall
increase in the prices of basic goods and services,
which impact more on the poor than the rich, Bayan said.
“The IMF
conveniently ignored these facts because the oil VAT is
its brainchild and it had been pressuring the government
to implement the said measure since the late 1990s to
guarantee that the country has a steady and reliable
stream of domestic revenues for debt payments,” Bayan
said.
Bayan
pointed out that the IMF’s role in the international
financial system is to ensure that borrower countries
like the Philippines will not default on their
obligations to creditors. |