|
WHEN
so-called “socio-fundadores,” composed of wealthy
Spanish and Filipino aristocrats and headed by the then
governor-general, started horseracing in the country in
1867, they had no inkling it would be a major industry
in the future.
Started
as a fun-sport among the aristocrats with no betting on
the side, local horseracing has evolved into a major
industry 140 years later and a prime source of money for
the government. From sales of P8.88 billion last year,
the government earned a whopping P1.3 billion (not
including the revenue for the December sales yet) in the
form of taxes.
The four
corners of the racing industry were thrown into chaos
recently when a full-blown war erupted between the three
existing horseowners’ groups on one side—the
Metropolitan Association of Race-Horse Owners (Marho),
the Philippine Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders’
Organization (Philtobo) and the Klub Don Juan de Manila
(KDJM)— and the Philippine Racing Commission (Philracom),
headed by chairman Florencio Fianza, on the other.
The
owners’ groups protested the “detrimental policies and
directives implemented since 2007 by the Philracom” and
even declared a “racing holiday,” which is tantamount to
boycotting the races that should have been hosted by the
Philippine Racing Club last weekend at the Santa Ana
Park in Makati. The “war” is still raging; it even
spilled over to the San Lazaro Leisure Park in Carmona,
Cavite, after the Manila Jockey Club failed to come up with enough
horses for its night racing Monday and Tuesday.
Chairman
Fianza, on the other hand, insisted “the problems in the
horseracing industry have been there long before my
appointment to Philracom (he was appointed May 2006) and
this group of horseowners chose to bring up other issues
and cannot even be honest to the public on what their
agenda is.”
Pledging
“to restore integrity in horseracing in the country and
ensure the betting public of a level playing field,” Mr.
Fianza said the horseowners’ real agenda “is all about
control and their bone of contention is the (new)
handicapping system” that is now in place for the two-
and three-year-old horses.
The
horseowners, on the other hand, accuse Mr. Fianza of
being very arbitrary, insisting on drastic reforms just
before the Christmas holidays and ignoring their pleas
for just a two-week moratorium.
The
exchange of unsavory remarks on both sides of the fence
is still raging in various media outlets and the “racing
holiday” declared by the owners’ groups continues.
Racing insiders estimate that the four-day suspension of
the races has already resulted in big losses, not only
to both racing clubs but also to the government (more
than P100-million lost revenue is now the rough
estimate).
Thousands of families whose incomes depend on the races
are suffering, too. They include those of the trainers,
jockeys, grooms, who do not receive salaries, unlike
most of their counterparts abroad; they only get
“commissions” from the winnings of their assigned
horses. No races mean no winnings, and no winnings mean
no money for the family. It’s as simple as that.
Then
there are also the owners of the off-track betting
stations (there are more than 300 OTBs nationwide) who
depend on their 75-percent commission from the gross
sales of their respective OTBs to pay for their rented
stalls.
The
racing clubs have already lost their respective 8.5
percent from the expected gross revenues which would
amount to several millions even while they continue to
pay their organic personnel. Without any sales, the
government gets no revenue in the form of taxes.
The
“racing holiday” is, indeed, wreaking havoc on the lives
of many people who depend on the industry. Allowing it
to continue will only heighten the tension between the
warring sides and worsen the sufferings of families who
have no direct participation in the “war of nerves;”
Definitely, this is most unfair to the latter. Many are
also afraid of the “ugly scar” the skirmishing would
leave not only on the warriors but also on the very
industry both parties claim to love and cherish.
The
“racing holiday” brings to mind the suspension of the
“daily-double” betting scheme for almost two months last
year because of its suspected manipulation by illegal
bookies. The suspension greatly reduced sales when the
betting scheme was eventually restored, and many believe
the exchange of “ugly words” between the two sides was
partly responsible for it.
Many
fear the acrimonious exchanges in the current feud may
have the same effect even after it is finally over. But
as things look, the situation may get worse before it
gets better. Chairman Fianza and the horseowners’
groups—particularly Mandaluyong Mayor Ben-hur Abalos,
who heads one group—seem utterly convinced of the
justness of their positions. And this means the
prospects of an early settlement of the case are not
hopeful
The
Office of the President, which directly supervises
Philracom, can help in the early resolution of the case.
Perhaps bringing the parties to a conference table to
thresh things out can be a good start. |