HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    Private port firms oppose
    rule amendments
     
    By VG Cabuag

    Reporter

    OWNERS and operators of private Philippine ports have expressed indignation at an initiative to amend regulations governing their facilities, saying that the changes would limit their market and work in favor of government-run terminals.

    Amado Gurango, president of  the Association of Private Port Operators and Owners of the Philippines Inc., told reporters last week that while its members understand the Philippine Ports Authority’s (PPA) need to raise rates, the move threatens some of its members’ operations.

    “The proposal of the PPA to increase the privilege fee by more than 500 percent is too exorbitant,” Gurango said, adding that the group’s members would agree to a rate hike of 10 percent.

    Gurango, who also heads the Philippine Flour Mills Corp., told reporters that the amendments, if approved, will allow the port body to treat private facilities the same as government-controlled terminals such as the Asian Terminals Inc. (ATI), which manages the South Harbor, and the International Container Terminal Services Inc. (ICTSI), which runs Manila International Container Terminal (MICT). These two properties are owned by the PPA.

    Under the proposal, a private port may be disallowed from handling government rice and sugar imports if it falls within a 27-nautical-mile radius from a publicly owned facility.

    The port body can choose either the South Harbor or the MICT rather than Harbour Centre’s facilities in Tondo, Manila for commodity imports even though the latter charges cheaper rates. Privately run Harbour Centre is located a kilometer away from the MICT and offers tariff rates 50- percent lower compared to those levied at government facilities. Its operations, however, are limited to bulk shipments and containerized cargo for its exporters. 

    The port agency and Harbour Centre are not in good terms since the former has never approved the latter’s application to handle containers belonging to entities other than its locators.

    A court case regarding Harbour Centre’s bid for the privatization of the Manila North Harbor, a facility owned by PPA, is currently ongoing.

    Currently, all private ports are remitting privilege fees worth anywhere from P10,000 to P20,000 each to the PPA annually. Meanwhile, fees paid by both ATI and ICTSI comprise 40 percent of the agency’s total annual revenues.

    Many local businesses manage its own facilities as part of its operations including RFM Corp., Petron Corp., and San Miguel Corp.

    All of private port operators are bound by PPA’s Administrative Order 6-95, signed in December 1995 by then PPA general manager Carlos L. Agustin.

    OTHER STORIES

    Private port firms oppose rule amendments

    OWNERS and operators of private Philippine ports have expressed indignation at an initiative to amend regulations governing their facilities, saying that the changes would limit their market and work in favor of government-run terminals.

    read more

    ICTSI may get full control of Subic cargo

    INTERNATIONAL Container Terminal Services Inc. (ICTSI) will be allowed to bid for the Subic Bay Free Port’s New Container Terminal-2, also known as the NCT-2, raising the possibility that the company may secure exclusive control of all cargo-handling operations at the entire free port.

    read more

    Second-busiest container port announces its earnings

    SHANGHAI—Shanghai International Port (Group) Co., operator of the world’s second-busiest container harbor, has reported 3.6 billion yuan ($494 million) in 2007 net income.

    read more