|
For Sen.
Mar Roxas, the ill-effects of smuggling on the economy
is such that industries are left staring at mounting
inventories and ever-growing losses as smugglers dump
their goods in the market sans the payment of the right
Customs duties and taxes. This should be amply addressed
by the government, the senator told an audience of
second-generation Filipino businessmen of Chinese
descent during a forum on the economy.
“Smuggling hollows out industries,” he said, to nodding
approval of the Anvil Business Club members, many of
whom are surviving by the dint of their perseverance to
simply coast along, clutching at the hope that the
pernicious effects of smuggling will eventually be
acknowledged and thereby addressed. From cement to
watches, cars to rice, scooters to resin, smuggling
continues to decimate the ranks of the entrepreneurs who
battle competitors who bring in untaxed goods with
impunity.
It is a
losing battle for the local businessmen as smuggling
goes on at the Customs zones and this, to the mind of
Senator Roxas, is indicative of the kind of palakasan
and sino ang kilala that is prevalent in the
country’s various piers. The issue on smuggling has long
festered and there was even a list of smugglers drawn up
by the Customs bureau, and yet nothing has come out of
it. The recent spectacle of car smashing meant to show
the government is serious against smuggling has been met
with incredulity from the public.
That
car-smashing episode only underscored the seeming
inability of the Customs bureau to check the activities
of known smugglers. Many are asking how come no one
responsible for the filing and processing of papers for
the smuggled cars has been identified. The papers that
were filed in connection with the cars could be properly
scrutinized, thus allowing the Customs bureau to charge
those guilty of the smuggling attempts before the
courts. And yet no action is hitherto forthcoming. Why?
Smuggling, for the senator, unmistakably shows the
kupit and kurakot mentality that has plagued
the government bureaucracy. This nefarious activity
clearly takes away what should have been revenues due
the government by way of taxes and duties. Instead of
benefiting the government coffers, kupit
shortchanges the government. Kurakot, meanwhile,
continues to go on in almost all agencies of the
government, depriving the poor of their livelihood
opportunities, for one.
The
senator, a former trade secretary, said that the
government should keep an eye on the greater good for
the greatest number. Thus, the Customs bureau should
pull out the folder on the list of known smugglers and
check that smuggling rules no more at the Customs zone.
Unless this is done, according to Senator Roxas, the
Filipinos would continue on their march to oblivion. “We
never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity,” he
said, and pointed to the laudable 9-percent growth in
Vietnam.
SBMA
controversy
Once
again, the country’s attraction as an investment
destination is facing a new challenge with the ongoing
controversy at the Subic Bay Freeport Zone. The said
controversy has already led to a joint resolution from
among proadministration and opposition lawmakers for a
congressional inquiry so that adequate safeguards could
be crafted to forestall another Subic Bay caper. The
controversy should not be allowed to go on; it should be
resolved immediately.
The new
challenge came by way of a resolution that the Subic Bay
Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) passed in the morning of
June 8. SBMA, under Administrator Armando Arreza, is
said to have passed a resolution terminating the 50-year
lease contract of United International Group Development
Corp. (UIGDC), operator of the Subic Bay golf course,
for its failure to settle P16 million in rental arrears.
What the
solons wanted to know is why the resolution was enforced
on that same day, and through the unwarranted use of
force. UIGDC officials complain that there were about 50
members of the SBMA SWAT team that swooped down on the
company’s offices and confiscated the company’s
properties. The solons wanted to know why the company
offices were taken over despite a court’s status quo
order on December 27, 2006, and a writ of preliminary
injunction dated May 4, 2007.
“If the
case is not resolved soon, no investor will come into
the Philippines,” warned Rep. Andres Salvacion of Leyte,
a former Customs official. There is worry from among the
11 solons who crossed party lines to denounce the SBMA,
stressing that the SBMA disregarded court orders.
This
sorry episode, involving as it does a foreign investor,
could severely affect the country’s attractiveness as an
investment destination. It is not worth it and the
sooner this is realized, the better. Investments, after
all, bring in precious foreign exchange that are then
converted into pesos with the proceeds used to erect
buildings, pay for workers and raise revenues for the
government. Between the SBMA and the Taiwanese investor,
there is a clear choice, and the use of force is
unnecessary.
E-mail: hugagni@yahoo.com. |