HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    Guilty of plunder
     
    By Rene Acosta
    Reporters

    THE Special Division of the Sandiganbayan on Wednesday convicted former President Joseph Estrada on two counts of plunder and sentenced him to life imprisonment, but did not commit him to the National Bilibid Prison in Muntinlupa.

    The same court, however, exonerated Estrada’s coaccused in the case, his son Sen. Jinggoy Estrada and his former lawyer Edward Serapio, on the ground that the prosecution failed to prove their guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

    At the same time, the Special Division acquitted the former President on the other case of perjury, which stemmed from his alleged misdeclarations in the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Networth for the year 1998.

    “Judgment is hereby rendered finding the accused, former President Joseph Ejercito Estrada, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of plunder,” the decision read.

    “The penalty imposable for the crime of plunder is reclusion perpetua to death. There being no aggravating or mitigating circumstances, however, the lesser penalty shall be applied,” the decision added.

    Estrada, who was standing while the decision was being read and clad in a barong Tagalog, calmly accepted the decision. He did not move, but shook his head later toward the end of the reading.

    His daughter Jackie Lopez, however, broke into tears and sobbed as soon as the court pronounced him guilty, while his son with former movie actress Guia Gomez, San Juan, Metro Manila Mayor J.V. Ejercito was teary eyed.

    Estrada’s wife, Loi Estrada, tightly embraced the ousted leader as soon as the decision was handed out.

    In addition to imposed life imprisonment on Estrada, the court also ordered the forfeiture of his assets, “the fruits of his corruption acts,” including cash amounting to P545.291 million, including the P200 million deposited in the name of his foundation, Erap Muslim Youth, P189 million deposited in the “Jose Velarde” account and his so-called “Boracay Mansion” which is located at No. 100, 11th Street, New Manila, Quezon City.

    On his way out of the courtroom, Estrada told reporters that he has been “convicted by a Kangaroo Court as expected.”

    “This is a special division created to convict me,” he added.

    Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa-Ignacio, who led a panel of government lawyers that prosecuted the more than six-year-old case, said the decision proves that the judicial system works.

    Estrada’s battery of lawyers, who waited for an hour to get a copy of the decision, said that  they would appeal the decision, also with the same court.

    Lead counsel Rene Saguisag said that “technically, Malacañang can now issue a pardon,” but he added, “it would not take effect, unless accepted.”

    Saguisag noted that his client is strongly against Palace pardon.

    “Erap holds the key to his freedom,” the lawyer said.

    Malacañang, however, has not announced that it is planning to grant Estrada executive clemency.

    The court’s decision was silent on Estrada’s place of incarceration, prompting the lawyers to ask whether he should continue to be held at his rest house in Tanay, Rizal, or he should be committed to the national penitentiary.

    Saguisag briefly conversed with the former President and informed the Special Division that his client would not seek special treatment from the government.

    “If it be Muntinlupa today, so be it,” he told the justices, adding that Estrada can directly travel to the national penitentiary from the court.

    “The former President stays in Tanay until further order from the court,” Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice and Special Division chairman Teresita Leonardo-de Castro, however, declared.

    While Estrada was charged with four predicates—accepting and collecting money out of jueteng operations, on the acquisition of Belle shares by the Government Service Insurance System and Social Security System, receiving P130 million of the Ilocos Sur tobacco excise tax and opening and maintaining the Velarde account as a repository for his illicit income. Under the plunder case, the court only held him on the Belle and jueteng charges.

    “The collections in several instances from illegal gambling money went way beyond minimum of P50,000,000 set by the antiplunder law. These repeated collections of jueteng money from November 1998 to August 2000 would fall within the series of illegal acts constituting plunder,” the court said.

    “We find that the prosecution has established beyond reasonable doubt that President Estrada directed and instructed [Social Security System chairman Carlos] Arellano and [Government Service Insurance System president Federico] Pascual for SSS and GSIS respectively to buy Belle shares,” it also said.

    But Estrada’s another lawyer, Estelito Mendoza, said that the court should have exonerated their client from the case, based on the definition of plunder, which is a combination or series of overt criminal acts, and upon the failure of the prosecution to prove that he was a conspirator.

    He said that the Belle charges could not in anyway be tied to the jueteng charges.

    Mendoza noted that former Ilocos Sur Gov. Luis “Chavit” Singson, who is the prosecution’s principal witness and who claimed to have collected for Estrada in the jueteng charges, was not indicted in the case, so there could be no conspiracy.

    “Singson was the one who collected the money. The acts were committed by Singson, yet he was not alleged as a conspirator,” he said.

    In the case of Belle, Mendoza said that the alleged kickbacks were received by businessman Jaime Dichavez and not by his client.

    Former Chief Justice Andres Narvaza, who was Estrada’s legal consultant in the case, said he was disappointed with the antigraft court’s verdict.

    Later, in a prepared statement handed out by the camp of Estrada, the former President said that he has been convicted of a crime that “I did not commit.”

    “I am innocent of all the charges. The prosecution miserably failed to prove its case. Evidence for the defense were not even rebutted, yet the Special Division still found me guilty. The direct and indirect pressures that have been made on this special court must have been too much to bear,” he said.

    Estrada said that he was leaving it up to his lawyers to decide on his next move, confident that “truth and justice will ultimately prevail.”

    Estrada went to the court accompanied by his family members and political leaders. Among them Mayors Jejomar Binay of Makati, Alfredo Lim of Manila, Toby Tiangco of Navotas and Edward Hagedorn of Puerto Princesa, Sen. Loren Legarda and Puwersa ng Masang Pilipino Reps. Rufus Rodriguez of Cagayan de Oro, Didagen Dilangalen of Maguindanao and Jesus Crispin Remulla of Cavite.

    The politicians said they want to hear the 212-page decision of the court. Incidentally and in agreement with the defense, only the dispositive portion of the decision was read and it was all over in two minutes.

    Sen. Jinggoy Estrada, reacting to the verdict, said he was greatly disappointed and was receiving the decision with “indignation.”

    OTHER STORIES

    Guilty of plunder


    Businessmen rejoice over peaceful reaction


    Relief! Peso, stocks gain after verdict


    Guilty! But special considerations for accused show flawed system


    Teves to work with PCGG on forfeited Estrada assets


    9/11? Fil-Ams prefer Erap news


    UBS buys 5% PNB stake


    Banks more prepared for financial risks


    Critics vow to seek TRO if JPEPA is ratified


    Asia’s appetite for luxe items seen surging